之前有大牛提供了一個方法 方法一 結論有新觀念 找有not的選項 結論沒有新觀念 去找新觀念 最近在寫assumption的題目 我發現這個方法多少有幫助 手足無措的時候可以用 方法二 在選項前加not 看可不可以反駁結論 方法三 最後是老方說得 assumption像是一個橋 他要連接前提和結論 如果兩方有一方不是橋的兩邊 必錯 我自己也在努力中啦<目前有進步> 這是我自己整理的小筆記 大家參考看看啦 ※ 引述《aaaaaakoyasu (六點半天色還沒亮)》之銘言： : ※ 引述《betterman720 (betterman)》之銘言： : : 以PP2-CR-40舉例好了 : : 40. (32847-!-item-!-188;#058&007552) : : A recent report determined that although only three percent of drivers on : : Maryland highways equipped their vehicles with radar detectors, thirty-three : : percent of all vehicles ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were equipped : : with them. Clearly, drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors : : are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who : : do not. : : The conclusion drawn above depends on which of the following assumptions? : : (A) Drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are less likely to be : : ticketed for exceeding the speed limit than are drivers who do not. : : (B) Drivers who are ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are more likely to : : exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who are not ticketed. : : (C) The number of vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit : : was greater than the number of vehicles that were equipped with radar : : detectors. : : (D) Many of the vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit : : were ticketed more than once in the time period covered by the report. : : (E) Drivers on Maryland highways exceeded the speed limit more often than : : did drivers on other state highways not covered in the report. : : 答案是(B) : : 想很久還是不知道為什麼 : : 有牛人願意解惑嗎? : : 小弟先謝過了^^ : 題目： : 該州3%的人裝有雷達探測器 : 該州被開超速罰單的人33%裝有雷達探測器 : 作者結論： : 裝有雷達探測器的人比沒裝的人較會超速 : 前提是： : 被開超速罰單的人都是因為常超速才會被開單， : 如果是偶爾才超速卻常被開單的話（＝被開單的都是很少超速的人）， : 整篇的立足點就消失了。 : 所以答案是B --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 59.115.102.234