※ 引述《betterman720 (betterman)》之銘言： : 從七月多開始準備AT到現在 : 最近剛做完OG OV OQ以及PP1 PP2 : 可是一直以來對assumption題一直存在疑惑 : 每次遇到這種題目總是有點憑感覺的猜 覺得很不踏實 : 之前補習的時候老師說過"assumption就是選題目中証據跟結論的主題" : 覺得還滿難意會的@@ : 不知道有沒有牛人願意分享這類題該怎麼解? : 以PP2-CR-40舉例好了 我是這樣做的, assumption題是指題目做結論的"前題" 意即..如果選項前加否定字或把否定字眼去掉 則題目的結論必不成立 : 40. (32847-!-item-!-188;#058&007552) : A recent report determined that although only three percent of drivers on : Maryland highways equipped their vehicles with radar detectors, thirty-three : percent of all vehicles ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were equipped : with them. Clearly, drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors : are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who : do not. 題目給的: 前提 3%的人(該州全部的人) 裝雷達偵測器 33%的人(被開超速罰單的人) 有裝了偵測器 結論 裝偵測器的人比較愛超速 自己想的: 前提證明裝了雷達偵測器的人比較容易被開罰單 因為裝偵測器的人只暫了總人口的3% 卻占了罰單數量的33% 但題目給的結論為愛超速 容易被開罰單並不完全等於愛超速 : The conclusion drawn above depends on which of the following assumptions? : (B) Drivers who are ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are more likely to : exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who are not ticketed. 選項若加個否定, 如果 容易被開罰單不等於愛超速的話,則題目結論有誤 故選B - 小小淺見 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.169.194.19