※ 引述《prettyting (get a food in the door)》之銘言： : Some patients who do not respond to therapies for depression may simply : have received inadequate treatment, having, for example, been prescribed a drug : ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ : at a dosage too low to be effective or having been taken off a drug too soon. : ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ : (A) having, for example, been prescribed a drug at a dosage too low to be : effective or having been : (B) having, for example, a drug prescription that was ineffective because : the dosage was too low, or being : (C) as, for example, having too low of a dosage of a prescribed drug for it to : be effective, or being : (D) when they have, for example, been prescribed too low a drug dosage : to be effective, or were : (E) for example, when they have a drug prescription with a dosage : 答案是A 我的想法是這樣的 不知是否有誤 歡迎補充以及討論 A. 正確 for example為插入句,句子可看成 Some patients..have recieved.., having been prescribed..or having been.. having句子修飾some patient的第一層動作"得到不當的treatment" or having been平行結構正確 B. drug prescription不如動詞prescribed 但最主要錯誤在or being....(不平行於having been) C. as, for example 為兩個重複性質的詞 as作"正如"解, for example又是舉例 且如果as作時間連詞,後面也應該有主＋動詞 還有時態不一致錯誤 D.E. 改變原句意,原句的having been....是要修飾第一層動詞狀態的have recieved 也可從時態不一致來刪除選項 D的when句子本身就存在時態不一致問題 when they have.....,or were.... E:主句動詞時態是現完式,when句子卻是現在式(have在此為動詞"有") : 實在不懂這題要從何下手... : 已經看過PP-SC的詳解了... : 詳解上所說的D和E的解釋不是很懂... : <詳解> : (D) 時態上不對稱，現在完成時與過去時並列have been prescribed... : or were taken off...；沒有表達原文的意思，因為when...引導的是時間狀語從句， : 但原文的意思（尤其是用了for example）是列舉了兩種inadequate treatment的情況 : （用了動名詞形式），而不是在什麼情況下會receive inadequate treatment。 : (E) 時態上不對稱，與D選項相同；have在本句是實意動詞，不能充當or後面需要 : 的助動詞have。 : 麻煩高手們幫我解惑下這題~謝謝! --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.228.109.177 ※ 編輯: anatawei 來自: 61.228.114.73 (10/13 20:38)