One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other copanies. This technique commanly called "benchmarking," permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices. Any of the following, if true, is a vaild reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT: (A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the comparisons already employs. (B) Getting "inside" information about the unique practices of competitiors is particularly difficult. (C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors. (D) Managers are generally more respective to new ideas that they fiund outside their own industry. (E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products or markets. Ans:E 複習第三遍了...這題題目還是霧煞煞 尤其是Any of the following, if true, is a vaild reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT: 這句,against是對抗還是相對?? except不要翻的話,負負得正要怎麼翻比較好(就是正向的想法)?? 麻煩各位小NN大NN超級大神來解說一下~~謝謝!! --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.168.74.24