※ 引述《princess1983 (加油!!)》之銘言： : People who have spent a lot of time in contact with animals often develop : animal-induced allergies, a significant percentage of which are quite serious. : In a survey of current employees in major zoos, about 30 percent had animal- : induced allergies. However, a zoo employee who develops a serious animal- : induced allergy is very likely to switch to some other occupation. : Which of the following hypothesis receives the strongest support from the : information given? 下列何者最受上文支持？ -> 這題是做結論 : A.The incidence of serious animal-induced allergies among current zoo employee : is lower than that among general population. 原文沒講一般大眾是怎樣 : B.Zoo employees tend to develop animal-induced allergies that are more serious : than those of other people who spend equally large amounts of time with animals. 原文沒提到動物園以外的人病況輕重 : C.Exposure to domestic pets is, on the whole, less likely to cause animal- : induced allergy than is exposure to the kinds of animals that are kept in zoos. 原文沒講家中寵物會怎樣 : D.There is no occupation for which the risk of developing an animal-induced : allergy is higher than 30 percent. 原文沒講其他職業的狀況 : E.Among members of the general population who have spent as much time with : animals as zoo employees typically have, the percentage with animal-induced : allergies is significant more than 30 percent. 正確。 原文說動物園中有些人病況太重就轉職了， 因此如果這些人沒轉職實際人數會超過30%， 因此可推知與其他動物接觸時間相等的人(比如說獸醫)， 得到過敏症的比例會大於30%。 : 這是TN24 中第17回的第22題(GWD26-Q22)的變形題 TN解答中沒給這題的答案 : 我自己很想選D 但我的邏輯很差 > <... : 我從一開始最先把D刪掉看到後面又最想選它...整個就是大矛盾 : 希望版上有人能幫忙解答這題 先謝謝了!! -- ※ 編輯: iammarsman 來自: 203.73.57.2 (09/24 00:42)