※ 引述《lovekyoko (Nothing is impossible扔)》之銘言： : 11. Shelby Industries manufactures and sells the same gauges as Jones : Industries．Employee wages account for forty percent of the cost of : manufacturing gauges at both Shelby Industries and Jones Industries．Shelby : Industries is seeking a competitive advantage over Jones Industries． : Therefore，to promote this end，Shelby Industries should lower employee wages : ． : Which of the following，if true，would most weaken the argument above? 題目是要weaken[降低員工工資以達成本減少]的這個論點 : (E)Many people who work for manufacturing plants live in areas in which the : manufacturing plant they work for is the only industry． : Because of the location of the company, employees are likely to continue : working even if wages are lowered；this statement strengthens，rather than : weakens，the conclusion : 我想請問E 我不懂解答上說法 為什麼是支持這跟公司位置有什麼關係??? (E)選項指出 大部分的工廠員工都會選擇住家附近的工廠工作 且他們工作的工廠是當地唯一的選擇 所以(E)選項間接表達[即使工廠降低員工薪資 員工還是會選擇在原工廠上班] 因為若要換工作則必須要到遠離住家的地方才能找到工作機會 既然薪資降低員工還是會持續工作 那麼[降低員工工資已達成本減少]的這個論點就沒有負面的效果反而是支持題目論點 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 123.193.248.134