On 23 April 2014 02:12, Ronald F. Guilmette <[email protected]> wrote: > > In message <[email protected]>, > Mark Andrews <[email protected]> wrote: > >>As for the number of CLANG analysis warnings. Clang has false >>positives > > Please define your terms. > > I do imagine that the truth or falsehood of your assertion may depend > quite substantally on what one does or does not consider a "false > positive" in this context. > >>some of which are impossible to remove regardless of how >>you recode the section... > > I, for one, would dearly love to see one or more concrete examples > which purport to support the above assertion (of which I am dubious). So try wading through the morass of false positives yourself and discover what a joy it is for yourself. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"