In message <[email protected]>, Mark Andrews <[email protected]> wrote: >As for the number of CLANG analysis warnings. Clang has false >positives Please define your terms. I do imagine that the truth or falsehood of your assertion may depend quite substantally on what one does or does not consider a "false positive" in this context. >some of which are impossible to remove regardless of how >you recode the section... I, for one, would dearly love to see one or more concrete examples which purport to support the above assertion (of which I am dubious). Regards, rfg _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"