On 9 April 2014 17:08, Joe User <[email protected]> wrote: > On 09.04.2014 17:29, Pawel Biernacki wrote: >> [snip] >> We need more transparency here. >> > > Please read this and other related threads and you'll understand that > the FreeBSD-SecTeam had no real chance to react earlier than they did. > http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2014/q2/22 > > In fact, they were realy fast, thanks therefor. Interesting lecture, thank you. But if FreeBSD SO wasn't on the mentioned list it's an argument for payable position because that can help developing more efficient social network in the future ;-). -- One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"