看板FB_security
標 題Re: Heartbleed / r264266 / openssl version
發信站NCTU CS FreeBSD Server (Wed Apr 9 02:58:46 2014)
轉信站ptt!csnews.cs.nctu!news.cednctu!FreeBSD.cs.nctu!.POSTED!freebsd.org!ow
--+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 15:47:29 -0700, Xin Li wrote:
> What would be the preferable way of representing the patchlevel? We
> can do it as part of a EN batch at later time. (Note though, even
> without this the user or an application can still use
> freebsd-version(1) on FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE and up to find out the
> patchlevel for userland).
On an updated system:
[(18:56:41) apeiron@behemoth ~] freebsd-version
10.0-STABLE
[(18:56:42) apeiron@behemoth ~] freebsd-version -k
10.0-STABLE
[(18:56:43) apeiron@behemoth ~] freebsd-version -u
10.0-STABLE
[(18:56:47) apeiron@behemoth ~]
I can't say this is very useful. Is this only supposed to work
for -RELEASE?
--=20
Chris Nehren
--+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD)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=q6jZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT--