看板FB_security
標 題Re: bind9 and CVE-2013-4854
發信站NCTU CS FreeBSD Server (Mon Jul 29 20:09:02 2013)
轉信站ptt!csnews.cs.nctu!news.cs.nctu!.cs.nctucs.nctu!!freebsdfreebsd.org!ow
--oJoa/b7Rsqp4yzB0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 12:03:43PM +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> A question related to this:
>=20
> What is it that prevents BIND from being removed from the base when
> there are very well working ports of BIND already that are far easier
> to update when vulnerabilities are found. Is it the dig(1), host(1)
> and nslookup(1) utilities?
Yes.
--oJoa/b7Rsqp4yzB0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAlH2Pz4ACgkQKc512sD3afgNUgCgmGUvFJuJbYdWiG1On3KIoZDS
tEEAn1Kqi1aOWxwvQBLZ2OOhhVHnjqZd
=D/1Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--oJoa/b7Rsqp4yzB0--