看板FB_security
標 題Re: FreeBSD needs Git to ensure repo integrity [was: 2012 incident]
發信站NCTU CS FreeBSD Server (Mon Nov 19 12:48:52 2012)
轉信站ptt!csnews.cs.nctu!news.cs.nctu!.cs.nctucs.nctu!.org!ownorg!owner-free
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Ivan Voras <
[email protected]> wrote:
> On 17/11/2012 22:48, Chris Rees wrote:
>
> > (and is GPL btw)
>
> Since we're discussing it, Mercurial is BSDL-ed, and apparently has
> proper crypto signing using GPG:
>
>
> http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/FAQ#FAQ.2FTechnicalDetails.How_do_Mercurial_hashes_get_calculated.3F
>
>
>
http://selenic.com/repo/hg/file/fd903f89e42b
http://selenic.com/repo/hg/file/fd903f89e42b/COPYING
"
GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
<
http://selenic.com/repo/hg/file/fd903f89e42b/COPYING#l2>Version 2, June
1991
<
http://selenic.com/repo/hg/file/fd903f89e42b/COPYING#l3>
"
In their repository , it is GPL v2 .
Is there any other place which specifies its license as BSDL ?
Thank you very much .
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
[email protected]"