David Schultz wrote: > ... In fact, recent results have > raised some concerns about SHA-1 (http://eprint.iacr.org/2004/146/). I have yet to hear any justification for claims that the SHA-0 attack implies a weakness in SHA-1. The paper you cite even says "Due to the additional rotate instruction, the results of this paper are not applicable to SHA-1". Colin Percival _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"