EngTalk 板


LINE

I saw this posted on the English Research board and am responding here as well. First, the problem with the China Post is not that it isn't "beautiful" English. The problem is that it suffers from poor grammar and using words or phrases in the wrong way. It doesn't even get the basics right (even if it is better English than what maybe the average Taiwanese person would write). Second, you are talking about the China Post as if there isn't a better alternative. If the China Post was the best English newspaper in Taiwan, then maybe I could understand. But the Taipei Times doesn't suffer from any of these problms and I can't remember a single problem with grammar or usage in many years of reading it. I don't doubt that the journalists at the China Post work hard, and of course they don't purposely make mistakes. But they aren't as good as the competition. Why would you buy the China Post to learn English if it has grammatical problems, but the Taipei Times does not? ※ 引述《AJ215 ()》之銘言: : I often hear people consider the China Post a lame English : newspaper because they think its diction is not profound : and its sentences not beautiful. It is a myth, in fact. : The China Post is my favorite source of news. It is so : simple and plain that I'm able read it effortlessly and get : information quickly and massively. No doubt the China Post : does not serve as a English-learning material but much as : a news agent for people who don't read Chinese newspapers. : Foreigners -- the Japanese, the Indonesian, the Russian, to : name a few -- who study, work and travel in Taiwan make up : a large proportion of the China Post's readership. (I once : saw a Filipino housekeeper in my neighborhood read the : China Post. And at Shida Language Center, exchange students : from the Middle East or somewhere else read it,too.) : Critics from some Internet bulletin boards also hold that : the China Post abounds in Chinglish, making native speakers : frown upon. Is that so? I wonder. Because as far as I know, : the China Post's staff must be excellent in English writing, : as a crucial part of their work. Those who critize the China : Post must weigh up their own English against that of the : China Post before they speak ill of it. : Last year, a Taiwan-produced English learning magazine called : "TIME Express" went out of print. Unlike Ivy and studioclassroom, : TIME Express was not profitable because it was so removed from : average needs. To put it simply, few people bothered to read a : magazine that was too hard for them, not to mention buying it. : I like to decribes TIME Express as a tragic hero who died young, : and the China Post, an underdog who lies low. Both are victims : of people's misunderstanding about how English is learnt to use. --



※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.57.136.181
1F:推 AJ215:Good point! I'll start reading the Taipei Times now 08/04 22:15
2F:推 Bigfatty73:don't you guys find both dullsome? 08/04 22:33
3F:→ Bigfatty73:no view points, no arguments, no words between the 08/04 22:35
4F:→ Bigfatty73:lines... they make news heavy...or is it just me? 08/04 22:37
5F:→ amerinese:The Taipei Times leaves its "color" for the 08/05 00:22
6F:→ amerinese:editorial section. You can check that out for that. 08/05 00:22
7F:噓 msupkg1211:Ok, lets be honest, do you really think that you 08/06 14:30
8F:→ msupkg1211:can get the best news from China post??? I dont 08/06 14:30
9F:→ msupkg1211:think so. Personally, I read NY Times when I wake 08/06 14:31
10F:→ msupkg1211:up and Wall Street Journal during lunch time. I 08/06 14:31
11F:→ msupkg1211:understand that some of the words might be diffcult 08/06 14:32
12F:→ msupkg1211:for beginner, but learning form the best editors 08/06 14:32
13F:→ msupkg1211:in US can improve your English immediately. I also 08/06 14:33
14F:→ msupkg1211:think that Times are good also. Regardless, Dont 08/06 14:33
15F:→ msupkg1211:really agree about China Post... but that might be 08/06 14:33
16F:→ msupkg1211:the best thing that TW can get currently 08/06 14:34
17F:→ Bigfatty73:Wall street juornal +1, like the way how the editor 08/06 15:31
18F:→ Bigfatty73:cuts in and digest subjects 08/06 15:31
19F:→ Bigfatty73:is retail available here in Taiwan? 08/06 15:33







like.gif 您可能會有興趣的文章
icon.png[問題/行為] 貓晚上進房間會不會有憋尿問題
icon.pngRe: [閒聊] 選了錯誤的女孩成為魔法少女 XDDDDDDDDDD
icon.png[正妹] 瑞典 一張
icon.png[心得] EMS高領長版毛衣.墨小樓MC1002
icon.png[分享] 丹龍隔熱紙GE55+33+22
icon.png[問題] 清洗洗衣機
icon.png[尋物] 窗台下的空間
icon.png[閒聊] 双極の女神1 木魔爵
icon.png[售車] 新竹 1997 march 1297cc 白色 四門
icon.png[討論] 能從照片感受到攝影者心情嗎
icon.png[狂賀] 賀賀賀賀 賀!島村卯月!總選舉NO.1
icon.png[難過] 羨慕白皮膚的女生
icon.png閱讀文章
icon.png[黑特]
icon.png[問題] SBK S1安裝於安全帽位置
icon.png[分享] 舊woo100絕版開箱!!
icon.pngRe: [無言] 關於小包衛生紙
icon.png[開箱] E5-2683V3 RX480Strix 快睿C1 簡單測試
icon.png[心得] 蒼の海賊龍 地獄 執行者16PT
icon.png[售車] 1999年Virage iO 1.8EXi
icon.png[心得] 挑戰33 LV10 獅子座pt solo
icon.png[閒聊] 手把手教你不被桶之新手主購教學
icon.png[分享] Civic Type R 量產版官方照無預警流出
icon.png[售車] Golf 4 2.0 銀色 自排
icon.png[出售] Graco提籃汽座(有底座)2000元誠可議
icon.png[問題] 請問補牙材質掉了還能再補嗎?(台中半年內
icon.png[問題] 44th 單曲 生寫竟然都給重複的啊啊!
icon.png[心得] 華南紅卡/icash 核卡
icon.png[問題] 拔牙矯正這樣正常嗎
icon.png[贈送] 老莫高業 初業 102年版
icon.png[情報] 三大行動支付 本季掀戰火
icon.png[寶寶] 博客來Amos水蠟筆5/1特價五折
icon.pngRe: [心得] 新鮮人一些面試分享
icon.png[心得] 蒼の海賊龍 地獄 麒麟25PT
icon.pngRe: [閒聊] (君の名は。雷慎入) 君名二創漫畫翻譯
icon.pngRe: [閒聊] OGN中場影片:失蹤人口局 (英文字幕)
icon.png[問題] 台灣大哥大4G訊號差
icon.png[出售] [全國]全新千尋侘草LED燈, 水草

請輸入看板名稱,例如:WOW站內搜尋

TOP