作者kuromo (記憶滿足回憶的人)
看板Economics
標題Re: 今年的諾貝爾經濟學獎得主出爐了
時間Tue Oct 16 02:55:48 2007
※ 引述《HowLeeHi (想和妳去把把風)》之銘言：
: 就在剛剛公佈了
: http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/2007/
: 分別是三位美國人
: Leonid Hurwicz
: Eric S. Maskin
: Roger B. Myerson
請問版上有對機制設計理論熟悉的先進嗎?
我剛才看了一下,這理論大概是設計在個經內類似賽局的模型
大至上是用來推論拍賣,社福跟醫學院學生的管制入學,公共財與最適稅收
好像是設計出一個模式讓結果可以依照設計模型人希望的結果走
有沒有大大可以詳加解釋一下這個模型的意涵,謝謝
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 218.170.174.208
2F：→ economist:You can download the article 70.101.72.218 10/16 03:43
3F：→ economist:"Scientific Background" from the 70.101.72.218 10/16 03:44
4F：→ economist:press release page of the Nobel 70.101.72.218 10/16 03:44
5F：→ economist:website. 70.101.72.218 10/16 03:44
6F：推 expertu:不是醫學院學生的管制入學， 122.126.65.134 10/16 07:55
7F：→ expertu:是醫學院畢業生和實習工作之間的matching 122.126.65.134 10/16 07:55
8F：推 dlanod:基本上..就是加上兩條限制式：IR跟IC..其中 218.171.180.10 10/16 20:51
9F：→ dlanod:IR=Individual Rationality constraint 218.171.180.10 10/16 20:51
10F：→ dlanod:IC=Incentive Compatibility Constraint 218.171.180.10 10/16 20:52
11F：→ dlanod:至於模型的細節請見：Contract Theory, by 218.171.180.10 10/16 20:52
12F：→ dlanod:Patrick Bolton and Mathias Dewatripont 218.171.180.10 10/16 20:53
13F：推 kk25:可以借轉一下嗎 :p 140.117.177.15 10/16 22:43
※ kk25:轉錄至看板 NSYSU_ECO96 10/16 22:46
14F：→ kuromo:1樓的,不回答就算了,你爸媽忘了教你禮儀嗎? 218.170.177.76 10/17 00:42
15F：推 julesL:economist版友沒必要這樣吧，學術討論版上 61.59.85.136 10/17 02:07
16F：→ julesL:出現F word 跟人身攻擊不妥吧 61.59.85.136 10/17 02:07
17F：推 economist:If kuromo felt offended, I apologize.128.151.210.219 10/17 02:48
18F：→ economist:If you keep reading the webpage, it128.151.210.219 10/17 02:49
19F：→ economist:says, "they gave you a link to this128.151.210.219 10/17 02:49
20F：→ economist:site as a JOKE." It has been a pretty128.151.210.219 10/17 02:50
21F：→ economist:popular joke up here. Finally, my128.151.210.219 10/17 02:50
22F：→ economist:answer was from line 2 to line 4.128.151.210.219 10/17 02:51
23F：→ economist:That article on the Nobel website is128.151.210.219 10/17 02:51
24F：→ economist:comprehensive and helpful.128.151.210.219 10/17 02:52
25F：→ economist:Kumoro's question is impossible to128.151.210.219 10/17 02:53
26F：→ economist:answer in limited space on bbs, but128.151.210.219 10/17 02:53
27F：→ economist:that's all answered in the article I128.151.210.219 10/17 02:53
28F：→ economist:suggested.128.151.210.219 10/17 02:54
29F：推 Liaooo:解釋這麼多也沒用，剛看到還是不太高興 1F 61.230.84.246 10/17 22:06
30F：推 LeChatelier:我倒是覺得沒什麼,或許有的人無法接受 218.170.54.215 10/18 02:04
31F：→ LeChatelier:西方幽默吧。更何況economist已道歉。 218.170.54.215 10/18 02:09
32F：→ Papachen:請到此為止～我想雙方都不是有惡意的謝謝 61.62.111.141 10/18 11:35