我看完了 內容是說 一位自幼失明的人Armagan能作畫 而且他很少迷路 並且能有空間感 對於其居住的地方的大小也有概念 他的劃能包括透視圖 就是向畫出一個正方體一般 而且能從不同角度畫 之後研究人員掃瞄他的腦 發現他作畫時 視覺區是有在活動的 但是研究者確信他並不能感覺到任何光線 文中提出了個問題：視覺是什麼？ 真的只是眼中接受光線 並在腦中看到影像嗎？ 顯然的 Armagan的例子否定了這個定義 ※ 引述《fanchihwen (Frank)》之銘言： : 今天那場研討會帶回來的議程內看到個參考文獻還蠻有趣 : 全文網址如下，落落長的全文我就不貼了... : http://www.newscientist.com/channel/being-human/mg18524841.700 : 題目是︰The art of seeing without sight : Abstract: : This article reports that painter Esref Armagan is in Boston to see : if a peek inside his brain can explain how a man who has never seen can paint : pictures that the sighted easily recognise — and even admire. He paints : houses and mountains and lakes and faces and butterflies, but he's never seen : any of these things. He depicts colour, shadow and perspective, but it is not : clear how he could have witnessed these things either. Because if Armagan can : represent images in the same way a sighted person can, it raises big : questions not only about how our brains construct mental images, but also : about the role those images play in seeing. -- There is some fiction in my truth And there is some truth in my fiction --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.63.100.115