作者whalelover (哞哞哞哞王)
看板DET_Tigers
標題[討論] V-Mart's reviewed homer
時間Wed Oct 9 09:35:07 2013
背水一戰總算是打出該有的氣勢了~
不過V-Mart的全壘打到底是不是主場優勢啊
先來看看截圖
http://ppt.cc/zvwS
根據棒球規則3.16
When there is spectator interference with any thrown or batted ball, the ball
shall be dead at the moment of interference and
the umpire shall impose such
penalties as in his opinion will nullify the act of interference.
APPROVED RULING: If a spectator
clearly prevents a fielder from catching a
fly ball, the umpire shall declare the batter out.
所以是裁判自由心證囉
Reddick或許可以接到吧(Maybe?)
但是 "clearly"? 我不認為
再來看看落落長的3.16 comment(台灣好像是翻成"原註"之類的東西 不管)
There is a difference between a ball which has been thrown or batted into the
stands, touching a spectator thereby being out of play even though it
rebounds onto the field and a spectator going onto the field or reaching
over, under or through a barrier and touching a ball in play or touching or
otherwise interfering with a player. In the latter case it is clearly
intentional and shall be dealt with as intentional interference as in Rule
3.15. Batter and runners shall be placed where in the umpire's judgment they
would have been had the interference not occurred.
No interference shall be allowed when a fielder reaches over a fence,
railing, rope or into a stand to catch a ball. He does so at his own risk.
However, should a spectator
reach out on the playing field side of such
fence, railing or rope,
and plainly prevent the fielder from catching the
ball, then the batsman should be called out for the spectator's interference.
Example: (舉例子而已 下略)
從截圖來看 這球依照路徑來說會clear the wall(至少裁判是這麼認為)
那Reddick這個守備就是reach over the fence了
但是 球迷確實是把手伸過去了
不過又來了 "plainly" 中文叫做"明顯的"
Did he plainly prevent Reddick from catching the ball?
我覺得沒有。
結論:我認為沒有誤判。
大家認為呢?
--
◣ ◢ HEY~~~HEY~~~CHAAAAARLIE~!
。。。。。
◢ ▁ ◣
⊙ ⊙
⊙ .◣
▼▼▼▼
ㄟ
◥ ㄧ◤
\▲▲▲▲
φ ◢ . \ . δ
./ㄨ \\/ˊ◥▄▄◤
\|/ㄑ ( ︶ ˋ\///\/. by Armour@joke
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.245.125
1F：推 ust:球迷手是在全壘打線上面, 伸過線就可能被判妨礙守備 10/09 09:45
2F：→ ust:我是覺得Reddick有機會接到這球, 不過他連皮都沒摸到XDDD 10/09 09:47
3F：→ whalelover:只要把手(或其他部位)跨過欄杆並且明顯的(plainly)阻止 10/09 09:47
4F：→ whalelover:野手接到球 就是fan interference 我認為前半是絕對符 10/09 09:47
5F：→ whalelover:合的 但是後半段沒有 10/09 09:48
6F：→ dannyalex:我覺得接不到耶～看截圖不準～要看影片～這截圖應該已經 10/09 09:48
7F：→ dannyalex:是Reddick跳到最高點準備落下的時候了 10/09 09:49
8F：→ dannyalex:看影片感覺跳的timing就有差了 10/09 09:49
9F：→ whalelover:我截圖主要是看球的路徑 這張圖應該是Reddick跳起來的 10/09 09:50
10F：→ whalelover:最高點了(我看了好多次) 10/09 09:50
11F：推 ust:我比較注意第二行:the ball shall be dead at the moment inte 10/09 09:50
※ 編輯: whalelover 來自: 140.112.245.125 (10/09 09:51)
12F：→ dannyalex:看球路徑的話～從影片看來很明顯就至少打在黃線上了 10/09 09:51
13F：→ ust:Reddick不見得接得到+球迷手沒過線, 不算干擾比賽 10/09 09:52
14F：→ whalelover:我是不是修到u大的推文了啊 10/09 09:53
15F：→ whalelover:不 他的邊界是fence,railing,rope 可以去google圖片 10/09 09:55
16F：→ whalelover:fence或是railing長什麼樣子 球迷已經超過了 10/09 09:55
17F：推 ust:Camerica場地規則怎麼查? 10/09 09:58
19F：推 yyjack:這球Reddick接不到 我上課偷看有跟同學討論 ㄎㄎ 10/09 13:47
20F：推 yyjack:BTW 這跟主場優勢實在扯不上邊 其他隊再說就隨他們唄 10/09 14:01