作者lerudit (l'Erudit)
看板CultureShock
標題Re: 我們的名字~
時間Tue Dec 5 01:50:30 2006
※ 引述《MMchocolate (我要徵人（友）！)》之銘言：
: 轉錄自我的網誌
: = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
: 「自我認同」是再強調一次我 "個人" 對英文名的看法。（之前好像提過）
:
: 全世界大概只有中國台灣和東南亞的人在用英文名吧。
^^^^^^^^ What do you mean?
No, I have seen many European (Greek, Hungarians, etc) doing this.
:
: 來幾個問題好了。
:
: 為什麼要用英文名？
: 是方便別人還是方便…？？（sorry, 實在想不出理由好方便什麼）
: 我愛英文？
It is actually up to you.
If you don't like that, don't use any foreign name then.
There are also many European translate their name into Chinese and
use them everywhere, for example, on T-shirt or even tattoo.
I cannot see any problem of that.
There is also nothing to do with culture and admiration.
Even though there is some relationship between name and admiration,
it is a sort of human right or personal freedom.
Unless being a politician (e.g. president), a person can freely decide to be
whatever people or belong to whatever country or culture.
You got to keep an open mind.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 218.166.50.203
1F：推 MMchocolate:「中國(頓號、)台灣」 網誌上忘了加 手誤 12/05 01:58
2F：→ MMchocolate:我前面推文也說這篇是有情緒性的，有些句子還刪了才貼 12/05 01:59
3F：→ MMchocolate:我想說的只是每個人都是平等，用英文名不是必要 12/05 02:02
※ 編輯: lerudit 來自: 218.166.50.203 (12/05 02:06)
4F：推 lerudit:It is not a must-do nor a forbidden manner. That's all 12/05 02:07
5F：→ saram:爭什麼平等? 12/05 21:03
6F：→ saram:台灣中學起就得學英文了. 老早一面倒了..... 12/05 21:03
7F：推 MMchocolate:樓上你口氣差什麼勁? 我只是提一種想法, 說「用英文名 12/06 08:23
8F：→ MMchocolate:不是必要」, 你心態才有問題! 12/06 08:24