※ 引述《lerudit (l'Erudit)》之銘言： : ※ 引述《lg31cm (30處男)》之銘言： : : 我去瑞典也碰到類似的情形，跟他們一起吃飯到最後就變成 : : 他們自己聊自己的，我只好坐在那邊發呆，假如你的英文沒有 : : 很好，他們似乎就懶得跟你聊了...0rz : There is nothing to complain really. Similar situations can also happen in : Taiwan. People can talk in Taiwanese but leave some others only understanding : Chinese alone. (我英文不好，我試圖瞭解你的意思...) 不過在台灣通常是一個講台語的與講國語的也能溝通，哈... : The only way to avoid this is to learn the language as young as possible. : If you are going to use it and pay the same cost on it, why not just do it : as soon as possible? : Next time, when you hear somebody objects to allow children to learn foreign : language for some reasons, do not believe them. 前後文好想有點不通?不過去之前我已經上了幾個月的英文會話課程， 還勉強可以溝通就是了(去玩還可以，開會討論就頗吃力了) (英文不好為什麼要去?這要問我老闆...= =) : : 歐洲人似乎認為英文流利是正常的，下次我應該跟他們說在亞洲 : : 沒有這回事，不然你就不會看到一堆從美國或歐洲的人跑來教英文 : : 順便泡妞...= = : This is not true. What are the Asia boundaries you recognise? : How about Singapore? India? Hong Kong? Philippines? : In fact, Taiwanese TOEFL language test results were quite bad.... : (probably still better than the football rank...) : I am not saying anyone is bad however, : but if you say Asian's English is commonly not good, then they could say : no, for my experience, XXX are very good.... and YYY and ZZZ all very good... : Then, you will stand in em...barr...ass...ment... 香港、新加坡、印度、菲律賓英文好有歷史因素，就像台灣被日本統治好長一段時間， 至今仍有不少老人會說日文是一樣的道理。況且這幾個國家加起就可以代表整個 亞洲嗎？不是嘛對不對？也許我應該修改成「在台灣沒有這回事」，這樣比較沒有 語病。 題外話: 英文是很重要沒錯，但是講的好像每人都有義務應該要精通就有點令人反感， (我以前碰過一個英文老師也這麼認為) 我在丹麥車站看到有個東歐來的英文講的比我還差，但是我並不歧視他... --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 59.112.37.71 ※ 編輯: lg31cm 來自: 59.112.37.71 (07/03 23:47)