http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/files/2008/10/big-questions-b.html In which category will Cate Blanchett ("The Curious Case of Benjamin Button"), Philip Seymour Hoffman ("Doubt"), and Michael Sheen ("Frost/Nixon") end up? These things can always change, but at the moment we're hearing that Hoffman will go supporting and Blanchett and Sheen will go lead. These are all carefully calculated moves. ... Blanchett has already received five nominations and won one of them. She is the second coming of Meryl Streep: an immensely talented actress who has acquired such reverence among her peers that she could simply slop on a little makeup and yell for two hours and get nominated. (How else do you account for her lead nomination last year for the entirely mediocre "Elizabeth: The Golden Age"?) So if "Benjamin Button" is even half as good as some of us believe it could be, then are Academy members really going to vote for a performance by a relative ingenue like Anne Hathaway in "Rachel Getting Married" over a tried-and-true vet like Blanchett? A huge chunk of voters don't even watch the movies, so are they going to reward a worthy but under-the-radar performance like Melissa Leo's in "Frozen River" or a familiar name like Blanchett? I'm not saying that Blanchett won't be worthy of a nod or that those other women won't get one anyway... just that Blanchett has to do less to get one than other contenders. -- 【倒片女王】凱特布蘭琪【票房毒藥】 ～ＣＡＴＥ ＢＬＡＮＣＨＥＴＴ～ The Curious Case of Benjamin Button‧班傑明的奇幻情緣 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 86.25.206.248