作者unidon (uni~uni~uni~daisuki~!!)
看板CMWang
標題[外電] Chien-Ming Wang, Occasional Ace
時間Sun Sep 2 09:57:22 2007
新聞來源:
http://www.observer.com/2007/chien-ming-wang-occasional-ace?page=0%2C1
Wang was victimized by a .366 BABIP in August entering today’s game, and had
a 5.46 ERA for the month as a result. His career BABIP mark of .291 has
yielded a career ERA of 3.83.
The problem is that BABIP is not a repeatable skill. Pitchers as skilled as
Pedro Martinez in his prime have seen BABIP go from .325 in 1999 to .217 in
2000. Pedro, however, took the spinning of the roulette wheel out of his
results often, striking out 313 in 213 innings in 1999, while walking just
37. He was able to minimize the damage luck could deal him.
Contrast that with recent Yankee Aaron Small, whose strikeout rate of 4.25
over two seasons in New York bests Wang’s career mark. Small held batters to
a .277 BABIP in his magical 2005 season, overcoming a strikeout rate of just
4.38 to post a 10-0 record and 3.20 ERA. In 2006, with a strikeout rate of
four per nine (but a BABIP that jumped to .388), Small posted an 8.46 ERA.
This is not to say that Wang’s performance will fluctuate as much as Small’
s did (for one thing, Wang’s walk rate remains steady, while Small’s did
not). But pitchers on the low end of the strikeout spectrum are extremely
vulnerable to the variables of baseball luck.
Wang also may not be so lucky with the home run ball, despite his ground ball
tendencies. He’s allowed seven long balls in his 166 1/3 innings this
season. But Seattle’s Felix Hernandez, whose groundball/fly ball ratio is
slightly better than Wang’s, has given up 17 homers in 150 innings. Even
Cleveland’s Fausto Carmona, whose 3.33 ground balls for each fly ball is
significantly better than Wang’s 2.62, has allowed 14 long balls in 173 2/3
innings.
Home run rate also fluctuates from year to year, regardless of the pitcher.
Brandon Webb, who throws a sinker as his main pitch as well, allowed 21 home
runs in 2005, 10 this year. Bruce Sutter, whose sinking action on his pitches
put him in the Hall of Fame, allowed 10 home runs in 101 1/3 innings in 1978,
then just 3 in 99 innings in 1979. And Sutter struck out well over a better
per inning in both seasons, meaning he had far fewer balls in play that could
leave the park than Wang does.
So the next time Ching-Mien Wang pitches, bring your rabbit’s foot to Yankee
Stadium. Rub Freddy Sez’s four-leaf clover for luck. And if you don’t see
batters swinging and missing much, hope the energetic Yankee hitters can come
to the rescue.
---
這篇寫得很不專業
看完了但不太想翻 XD
這篇文章下面有九篇comment
幾乎都是"totally disagree (with this article)"
有興趣的可以連到原文網址看一下
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.141.41.90
1F:→ DK2s:根本是來嗆的 看最後一段 commemt裡有人要他公開道歉了 09/02 09:59
2F:→ geniusw:法西斯戰puma 王板戰ace 09/02 10:00
3F:→ DK2s:更好笑的是東森新聞 "王建民為何這麼好 美知名刊物告訴你" 09/02 10:01
4F:→ DK2s:就是引用這篇,記者可能英文很差吧 09/02 10:02
5F:推 fizeau:pitchers on the low end of the strikeout spectrum 09/02 10:09
6F:→ fizeau:extremely vulnerable to the variables of baseball luck 09/02 10:09
8F:→ superholy:記者看的應該是同一篇 09/02 10:11
9F:推 derekhsu:這篇明明就是在說王是強運才有這樣的成績 09/02 10:19
10F:推 Piaf:嘿嘿!有一個comment是小弟貢獻的...這個作者實在是太偏頗了 09/02 10:31
11F:推 leocheng:那作者屁那麼多有啥用 王還是能贏這麼多場啦 他慢慢屁吧 09/02 10:33
12F:推 belucky:記者英文重修 ( =_= ) 09/02 10:52
13F:推 goetz:大概是隔壁板鄉民上去寫的^^ 09/02 11:11
14F:推 kauw:這種文大概要到王投五六年都很猛才會消失 09/02 11:13
15F:推 erichito19:其實全壘打的那段是有道理的 09/02 11:23
16F:→ erichito19:王今年飛球變全壘打的比率低到4.5%.. 09/02 11:23
17F:→ erichito19:實在是蠻誇張的數字 09/02 11:24
18F:推 clifflu:老實說 我覺得這篇文章還挺中肯的. 他從兩個可能是運氣的 09/02 11:30
19F:→ clifflu:角度分析,說明王建民的表現有運氣存在。 09/02 11:31
20F:→ clifflu:這一來提示讀者可以重新檢驗某些數據頭的定見, 09/02 11:32
21F:推 finals:廢文一篇 09/02 11:32
22F:→ clifflu:也提醒王建民表現的一些指標 (三振率等等) 應該算淺顯易懂 09/02 11:32
23F:→ clifflu:又合理 09/02 11:33
24F:→ clifflu:算了, 還是直接翻出來, 讓大家看看我的解讀吧 09/02 11:33
25F:推 hyperforce:這觀點是沒有錯的 要噓也是噓台灣記者亂引用吧 09/02 11:42
26F:→ davidyee:沒人翻譯外電 記者只好硬上了 09/02 11:44
27F:推 adaw:講的並非毫無道理 但是最後的結論實在很刺眼... 09/02 11:53
29F:推 waqw:another Wang hater? XDD 09/02 12:08
30F:推 applejone:又是K/9... 09/02 12:37
31F:推 pikoto:寫的有點偏頗.another Wang hater. 隊長季初有說過 球隊打 09/02 12:37
32F:→ pikoto:球隊打不好就是三個環節無法好好銜接.但是小王出來投就是可 09/02 12:39
33F:→ pikoto:小王就是可以讓三個環節配合好好的贏球這不是運氣而是 09/02 12:39
34F:→ pikoto:穩定軍心 09/02 12:40
35F:推 Annrod:並且他有點仰賴球隊的防守功力(絕非洋基的強項)和很大的運긠 09/02 13:12
36F:→ Annrod:這句剛好是矛盾,也可以看出小王到底是不是像大家說的運氣 09/02 13:12
37F:→ Annrod:防守明明就是洋基所不擅長的,失分還能這麼低,到底是小王 09/02 13:12
38F:→ Annrod:運氣還是小王的實力? 09/02 13:14
39F:→ Annrod:不過我猜這位應該是最近才注意到小王,因為這類的言論在去 09/02 13:15
40F:→ Annrod:年早就很常看過了 XD 09/02 13:16
41F:→ Annrod:(三振率低,所以不是好投手等blahblah) 09/02 13:17
42F:推 jerrywin:下面有幾篇comments寫的很好 都能電死原文了 09/02 14:06
43F:→ jerrywin:王的BABIP都跟平均差不多 去年還比平均高勒 09/02 14:09
44F:推 pkff8763:運氣也是實力的一種....人助自助才是他16勝的原因 09/02 14:11
45F:→ Datow:Sutter靠的應該是快叉 09/03 00:35