※ 引述《jmc (cryptomatician)》之銘言： : http://forum.hkbridge.net/index.php : 香港青年隊 有個很熱鬧的討論串: "香港青年軍全軍覆沒...". 我很快翻了一下. :P 有人說 Intercity 青年組比賽水準低... 對啊, 是不怎麼高. 然後一直有人說台灣兩隊的防禦不夠好耶. 不知道. 就我自己的感覺, 後來檢討牌局時, 看到兩隊主打和叫牌的狀況也很多啊. @@ Jerome Cheung 倒是大力推崇了一番: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I think, our team still lack stability and the experience in playing in such a long match... In the qualifying rounds, we perform reasonable well, at least we know what's going on at the bridge table... In the KO, we seems cannot concentrate much on the cards. Personally, I have drunk more than 10 cups of coffee throughout the match to retain energy... Maybe there is not too much chances for us to play bridge in high standard for a couple of days continuously But I must admit that the Taiwan Teams are much better in terms of stability. Their play is usually very sound, and their biddings are usually quite reasonably, and their agreements in different situations are usually quite detail. They can retain high level of bridge throughout the whole event. I think that they really deserve the victory, at least I believe they are better than my team in many different prospect. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 另外一篇: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 總結... 香港青年隊的基本功力唔夠好...... 叫牌concepts 可能差唔多, 防守技巧都差唔多, 但係主打不足係我地落敗既原因.. 仲有..加上佢地有一位好好既領隊...有人作事後討論...事前分析... 點都好過我地偉大既ARTHUR..好辛苦咁做playing captain... 所以話...mentor對於youth其實好重要... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 事前分析似乎沒有, 事後討論的確不少. 初賽最後一天, 其中一隊必須背水一戰, 最後 兩場若贏得不夠多就要被淘汰了. 前晚討論牌局到凌晨兩點, 大概是有一點效果吧. :P 好像我研究和討論青年組牌局花的時間, 比檢討我自己在公開組比賽所花時間更多. orz --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ※ 編輯: jmc 來自: 61.217.140.196 (10/19 23:01)