作者Geigemachen ()
看板Brethren
標題[心得]愛任紐的神意論
時間Sat Aug 30 16:54:11 2008
http://www.religiousstudies.co.uk/tripod/iretheo.htm
The Irenaen Theodicy
St Irenaus (130 - 201AD) was one of the early ‘fathers of the church’, he
distinguised two stages of Human beings.
1.
Image, in the first stages human beings were
not the perfect beings which
Adam and Eve were, they were
immature creations with immense capacity for
spiritual and moral development.
2.
Likeness, in the second stage,
occuring now, humans are being transformed
into ‘
children of God’.
The Irenaen Theodicy relies heavily on the importance of human freedom.
Irenaeus suggests that human ‘goodness’ comes from it’s response to moral
decisions made in an imperfect world, when temptation is resisted it is
infinitely more valuable a lesson learnt than if it had been an inherent part
of the being. The idea being that the human race was not created in a state
of perfection but in a state of imperfection but leading to a state of
perfection. Also if Humans were created with a knowledge of their creator
they would not have the complete freedom to do as they wished, so human kind
had to be made at an epistemic distance from God, (Remember kids
epistemic=knowledge). So, they are formed within a universe which God is not
a blatently obvious intrusion into their lives, but available to be known
through the faith of the individual. We have a tension between the selfish
needs of survival and the spiritual and moral needs to ‘rise above’ our
self centeredness, in this war of life choices we develop into ‘good’
creatures more the ‘likeness’ of God.
Basically, in order for us to develop morally toward God we had to be created
(and exist) at a distance from him, therefore there had to be horrid things
in the world.
we know need to concentrate on the problem of pain and suffering in the
world. The normal assumption of the skeptic is that God has supposedly
created a perfect world and that if there is suffering in it it must mean
that...
a) God is a nasty or weak character.
b) God does not exist.
For Irenaeus this problem is overcome by the idea that the world is not
finished, we are ‘moving toward’ perfect but we are not there yet. God’s
purpose was not to construct a paradise where the world was free of pain and
suffering, but as a place where soul-development can take place, where
mankind may become ‘children of God’.
This is where the ‘conterfactual hypothesis’ comes in.
(note: conterfactual hypothosis, in other words think of the opposite
alternative and see if this could have worked if it doesn’t then there is no
real alternative. In this case imagine a world with no suffering, properly
mind, think of all the implications!).
So, God wants us to develop freely to become ‘children’, he must threrefore
be epistemically removed from creation in order to give us the perfect
environment to develop both spiritually and morally into top quality
individuals, without pain suffering and other nastiness this could not happen.
The Irenaean Theodicy however does need an after life (heaven to be precise)
for three reasons.
First - although it can be seen that pain and suffering can produce a response
of selflessness, love and moral steadfastness, often it may not. If this is
the case the development must continue after death for life to be anything
other that a useless and unnecessary cause of pain for some people.
Second - for all the pain and horibleness in the world there must be a top
quality reward at the end to make it all worth it. Realistically I’d rather
be morally corrupt and happy than the greatest saint who walked the earth
living in constant pain and yuckiness. There must therefore be some further
development.
Third - for the theodicy to be complete all humans must attain the heavenly
state otherwise God’s intentions of humanity becoming his ‘children’ will
have been ruined (and we can’t have that now, can we?)
--
上月球!月球是中國人吳剛不可分割的一部分
抓嫦娥!此女意圖分裂中國領土脫離中國掌握
殺玉兔!玉兔為資產階級之玩物!日帝之玩偶!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.166.233.151
※ 編輯: Geigemachen 來自: 118.166.233.151 (08/30 17:36)
※ 編輯: Geigemachen 來自: 118.166.233.151 (08/30 17:37)
※ 編輯: Geigemachen 來自: 118.166.233.151 (08/30 17:59)
※ 編輯: Geigemachen 來自: 118.166.242.137 (10/07 16:34)