※ [本文轉錄自 NBA 看板 #1Ee1d0oL ] 作者: sampsonlu919 (父親，願你安息) 看板: NBA 標題: [專欄] 新賽季聯盟五大隊內競爭 羅伊慘被擠下臺 時間: Thu Oct 20 20:53:17 2011 http://www.espnstar.com.tw/news/basketball/2011/1020/218103.htm 新賽季聯盟五大隊內競爭 羅伊慘被擠下臺 HoopsWorld專欄作家Jason Fleming指出多支球隊存在著球員需要爭奪先發位置的狀況， 隊友之間關於位置的「窩裡鬥」向來激烈，他同時也挑選了其中的幾組人選進行了一番 比較。 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Five Position Battles to Watch 原文:http://www.hoopsworld.com/five-position-battles-to-watch/ 翻譯:一線戰鬥 波特蘭拓荒者隊，馬修斯vs羅伊 Portland, Shooting Guard: Wes Matthews v. Brandon Roy Ideally Coach Nate McMillan would allow these two to openly battle for the starting spot, but the reality is if the pair is even close Roy will get the edge. Is that a good idea? Arguments can be made either way, but a fully engaged Roy coming off the bench is a Sixth Man of the Year candidate because of the leadership he can bring to a second unit. Matthews would be solid in the role, but his defense (and health) makes him a better fit starting. 比較公平的做法便是總教練麥克米蘭(Nate McMillan)公開讓這兩位球員爭奪先發位置， 但事實或許是假如兩者的表現相仿，那麼羅伊應該會更受青睞。這會是一個好主意嗎？ 各有利弊吧，讓羅伊作為替補去爭奪年度最佳第六人的話著實會激起他的鬥志，畢竟 他能夠為球隊的第二梯隊帶來無與倫比的領袖才能， 而讓馬修斯擔當主力其實並不差， 他的防守以及身體條件都會令他更適合這個角色。而曾經的玫瑰花園之王，恐怕只能 暗自神傷了。 Pick: Matthews 勝者：馬修斯 克里夫蘭騎士隊，戴維斯vs歐文 Cleveland Cavaliers, Point Guard: Baron Davis v. Kyrie Irving When the Cleveland Cavaliers acquired Baron Davis for Mo Williams back at the trade deadline last season, it wasn’t about bringing in Davis even though he ’s a two-time All-Star with career averages of 16.5 points and 7.3 assists. No, they made the trade because the Los Angeles Clippers gave them their first-round pick, a pick that ended up number one overall – and became point guard Kyrie Irving. 騎士隊透過交易換來戴維斯的真正目的是因為洛杉磯快艇隊願意同時送出他們的首輪選秀 權，而他們也早已將目光放在了歐文身上。 It’s clear Irving is the future of the franchise, not Davis. While Davis may initially get the nod due to experience, it won’t be for very long. And if everyone knows that and the plan is for Irving to take over quickly in the hopes he makes an impact like previous top point guards Derrick Rose and John Wall, why wait? The Cavaliers aren’t contending for anything soon, so give Irving the job. Davis is a solid backup Irving can learn some of the finer points of the NBA game from, but he’s not the future. Let the future start now. 毫無疑問，歐文會是騎士隊未來的希望，在這一點上，戴維斯根本無法與之相提並論。 或許在賽季初段，戴維斯能夠靠著豐富的經驗坐上先發位置，但相信這樣的情況不會 持續很久，因為每個人都期望著歐文能夠盡早接管球隊並展現出和羅斯(Derrick Rose) 或沃爾(John Wall)相近的水準。既然對歐文如此有信心，那為何還需等待呢？何不讓 騎士隊的未來現在就學習如何當家。 Pick: Irving 勝者：歐文 丹佛金塊隊，米勒vs勞森 Denver Nuggets, Point Guard: Andre Miller v. Ty Lawson The Nuggets are in a similar situation with their point guards as Cleveland, but the problem here is they traded a point guard who felt he was a starter (Raymond Felton) away for…a point guard who feels he should be a starter (Miller). And guess what? He’s right. Miller is one of the most durable and productive point guards in recent history and has done nothing to show he either deserves to be a backup or will embrace that role. 金塊隊的處境和騎士隊非常相似，但問題是他們通過交易換來的米勒自己就認為本該擔當 主力，而他的判斷也是正確的，米勒或許是當今聯盟中發揮最持久和穩定的控衛之一。 Well, that’s not exactly true. If Coach George Karl comes into camp and says how these two play will determine who starts and Lawson wins the job on the floor, Miller will have no issues backing him up. Will that happen? Why should Miller expect it will, when Felton didn’t get that chance? Lawson finished the season as the starter after the Carmelo Anthony trade that also included Chauncey Billups and he played very well, to the tune of four double-doubles and scoring 20 or more points eight times (and twice more in the playoffs). Unfortunately for Miller it’s unlikely he gets a true shot. 不過米勒在金塊隊所面臨的挑戰也不小，勞森透過上賽季末的表現已經獲得了教練組的 認可，因此他的機會顯然會大於米勒 Denver could do him a favor and trade him to a team where he will start, because his starting days are not behind him. 而後者或許只能期盼再次被交易才有可能獲得先發機會，畢竟這位老牌控衛在聯盟中的 時日已經不多。 Pick: Lawson 勝者：勞森 明尼蘇達灰狼隊，比斯利vs威廉斯 Minnesota Timberwolves, Small Forward: Michael Beasley v. Derrick Williams On one side sits the second overall pick of the 2008 NBA Draft, a player who can play either forward position and is a proven big-time scorer – Michael Beasley. His rebounding is suspect, has a history of off the court issues, and some have questioned his commitment to improvement. 比斯利是一位能在大小前鋒兩個位置上遊走的球員，而他的得分能力更是不能小視，但 籃板球能力上的匱乏以及時常在場外惹麻煩成為了阻礙他繼續成長的絆腳石 On the other side is…a player who can player either forward position and is a big-time scorer, the second overall pick in the 2011 NBA Draft – Derrick Williams. Unlike Beasley, no one questions Williams’ commitment and he showed in college he can be a very effective rebounder 這一點恰恰是威廉斯的優勢所在，他在大學中已經證明了自己的品性，同時也將籃板球 的爭搶能力展現無遺。 While both players can play both positions, the reality is neither of them will see many minutes at power forward because Kevin Love owns that spot. 儘管在理論上可以派遣兩位球員同場獻技，但勒夫(Kevin Love)早已穩坐大前鋒位置， 因此這樣的可能性已被推翻。 Pick: Williams 勝者：威廉斯 奧克拉荷馬雷霆隊，哈登vs塞弗羅薩 Oklahoma City Thunder, Shooting Guard: James Harden v. Thabo Sefolosha This may be the most difficult pick of the bunch. Sefolosha is a defensive specialist, charged with taking on the other teams top wing scorer (or point guard, if the PG is a scorer) to take pressure off stars Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook. 這或許是最難挑出好壞的一組對比，塞弗羅薩是防守專家，可以用來專門對付對手珍重 的頭號得分點，同時也可以減輕杜蘭特（Kevin Durant）和威斯布魯克（Russell Westbrook）在防守端的壓力。 Harden, on the other hand, is a scoring machine. He’s a decent defender, but he needs the ball in his hands to be effective. There has been a lot of talk about what Harden could do in the starting role, but the reality is there may be no better fit for the Thunder as the third guard than Harden. He brings instant offense off the bench and should be a Sixth Man of the Year contender. 而哈登則像是一臺得分機器，他的防守能力中規中矩，但還是偏重於進攻，而外界也一直 認為他更適合擔任球隊第六人的角色，畢竟在主力陣容中不缺少進攻火力。 Pick: Sefolosha 勝者：塞弗羅薩 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.217.192.251

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ※ 轉錄者: n33310 (114.46.206.242), 時間: 10/20/2011 21:33:08