作者McDaniel (兩樣的心情)
看板BLAZERS
標題Re: Jason Quick's Highlights
時間Fri May 21 17:25:58 2004
: What are your thoughts on the following collegiate players:
: Luke Jackson, Jameer Nelson and Josh Childress.
: Nash's take: "Childress is a very, very effective basketball
: player who doesn't have...a superior physique.
: Luke Jackson is a terrific all-around basketball
: player. (Jameer Nelson) has the smarts that head
: coaches really like."
基本上如果要比較Luke Jackson和Josh Childress的話,我個人
認為是Luke Jackson出線。畢竟兩人的身高相差不多,但是以身體厚
度來看的話,Luke Jackson(6-7 ,215lbs)比Josh Childress(6-
8 ,208lbs)來得硬,當然從兩人的comparison也可以看出一些端倪
(Jackson :Brent Barry ;Childress :Reggie Miller ),只是
有點牽強罷了!:p只是John Nash 提到Childress 的體能是非常優異
的,在這點上又是Childress 占上風,總之這兩位球員都算是不錯的
射手球員。至於Jameer Nelson ,前面有幾篇文章提到他,我就不多
說了!不過之前看了某篇文章,感覺那篇文章提到他目前還不是拓荒
者隊特別想要的球員,嗯~還是靜觀其變吧!
: How do you plan on attacking things this summer. What are your
: priorities?
: Nash's take: "I think we'd like to (re-sign Miles). But then
: the question is at what price, under what terms?
: He's the first order of business. I don't anticipate
: any extensions prior to the expiration (of any)
: contract..."
當然今夏拓荒者隊的盛事不外乎就是選秀,re-sign player以及
保護名單還有自由球員市場的競爭。re-sign player的部分,目前拓
荒者隊的重點當然就是放在D-Mile身上,只是目前得到的消息好像是
金額還沒有交集的樣子。當然能用大約五百萬左右的薪資簽他應該算
是合理的範圍。
: Is Zach Randolph proving himself to be a franchise player?
: Would the Blazers consider trading him?
: Quick's take: "From what I hear, Paul Allen is extremely gun
: shy to let another young, up-and-coming player
: go. He doesn't want another Jermaine O'Neal on
: his hands. Do I think he's a franchise player
: (right now)? No."
這點似乎Quick 比較不贊同軟豆腐是franchise player,當然他
有他的看法,我不能多說什麼。不過從季初就有風聲說讓軟豆腐擔任
teamleader,我看了幾篇OregonLive.com的相關文章,都有提到軟豆
腐具有信心的訪問內容,我想從1999~2000 season 那個群龍無首的
時代開始,拓荒者隊一直都找不到一個真正的龍頭,好不容易這個球
季已經有一個明確的球員了,我是希望就這樣下去,畢竟軟豆腐也以
行動、成績和獎項來證明他所言不虛。至少在我心中,軟豆腐就是拓
荒者隊的franchise player,特別在Bonzi 和Sheed 離開之後......
: Gut reaction: Will the Blazers trade Abdur-Rahim for a shooting
: guard this summer?
: Quick's take: "My gut says 'yes', although I think John Nash
: doesn't want to do that."
或許rumor 傳得鬧哄哄的,我們也覺得有其可行性,但是遠在美
國的Jason Quick 有其內幕消息,至少比我們知道得多了!目前我覺
得Abdur-Rahim 一定是留不住了(除非拓荒者隊的高層發瘋,把軟豆
腐拿來交易),只是結果也許不是直接交易來Ray Allen ,也許有可
能是Brent Barry (sign-and-trade),Vladimir Radmanovic 加上
Jerome James(之前聽到朋友提的rumor )。不過最後真的會把他給
交易走嗎?如果沒有,我想拓荒者隊的戰績是無法有所提振的。
: Will the Blazers bring Arvydas Sabonis back for a postseason run?
: Quick's take: "Nash has been keeping that kind of on the back
: burner. Really, I don't think they would (bring
: him back). I just don't think it feels right..."
沒想到在季末時期,Sabus 又被人拿出來提了一番。雖然Sabus
是我心中的中鋒典範,不過以他現在的情況而言,已經不是再回NBA
的好時機了!真的為他感到可惜,太晚進入NBA 了!
: Shareef Abdur-Rahim appears to be too talented to be playing
: only 15-20 minutes per game. Can't he and Randolph co-exist?
: Quick's take: "Last night (vs. Indiana) I think you saw that
: he and Zach were on the floor together. I think
: ...you'll see more of that..."
我覺得這兩位球員各有其特色,只是兩位都是先發等級的球員,
所以當其中一位擺在替補時,就顯得十分浪費了!基於這個理由(當
然還有別的因素),我是希望趁著他還有一定的市場價值時,快點利
用交易把他交易出去,換來拓荒者隊需要的後場或是射手,這樣拓荒
者隊的未來才會顯現光明。
: Does Travis Outlaw have a chance to be a good player in this league?
: Ruben's take: "I think he can. He's still young and he's working
: hard every day. They guy has great talent."
以以往的經驗來看,Outlaw也許會步入Woods 的後塵,除非哪天
Mo發瘋,讓Outlaw上場打了快二十分鐘,而且他又表現得很出色,像
是20分10籃板等等的成績(基本上這個機率比出門被雷打到還低),
不然他應該會再坐一整季的冷板凳吧?為Outlaw哀悼......
: Agree or disagree: The Blazers would be better off trading
: Zach Randolph and keeping Shareef Abdur-Rahim.
: Quick's take: "I think, overall, Shareef Abdur-Rahim is a better
: player than Zach Randolph and he's a more reliable
: person. I don't like what I've seen from Zach in
: the last month. I think Shareef is a guy you can
: build around."
這個問題一直被提到,可見這是拓荒者隊必須得解決的問題之一
。Jason Quick 認為軟豆腐不是隊上的franchise player,所以要重
建也是從實力在軟豆腐之上的Shareef 為中心。我承認我對軟豆腐的
私心很重,在這點來看,我是十分反對Quick 的言論的。但是人有言
論自由,我只好忍氣吞聲,在遠在另一端的臺灣大肆獗詞了!T_T 基
本上我是認為軟豆腐在處理球方面還得加強,另外就是防守,等這兩
點都改善了,我想晉級西區四大前鋒絕對不是夢想。
: How certain are you that the Blazers will re-sign Darius Miles
: next season?
: Quick's take: "...it's very likely that he'll be re-signed.
: The team is estatic with his play since he's
: come here. Paul Allen absolutely loves the guy."
當然球隊擁有一個全美知名的球員,是可以替球隊拉來一些目光
的。我想基於這樣的理由,Paul Allen會放掉這樣高知名度的球員嗎
?I don't think so!至少我是這麼想的啦!所以人能留下來是蠻可
能的,至於價錢,跟我沒關係,因為That's Allen's business !XD
: Mo Cheeks watched Oregon's Luke Jackson play in the NIT in
: Madison Square Garden. What were his impressions of Jackson's game?
: Quick's take: "He loved his savvy. And he was bigger than
: (Cheeks) thought. He left very, very impressed
: with Luke Jackson."
從這幾天看到的文章,Luke Jackson算是一位實力比聲勢還有料
的球員,這是我的感覺啦!不過從Mo去Madison Square Garden 看他
的比賽後,對他的表現感到印象深刻,再加上前面提到他在Chicago
進行work的一些故事,不難發現他還是一位深藏不露的球員。只是目
前看到的mock draft網站中,他的排名大約是第一輪中段,我想等到
正式的測試進行之後,他若能好好表現,還是很有機會進入前段的。
: Have we seen the last of Qyntel Woods this season?
: Quick's take: "Yeah, I think we have. I think he needs to
: address his drug usage. I think that has become
: a problem. I think it's pretty widely accepted
: in this organization that he has a problem there
: and that has led to a lot of his poor decisions."
看來他給人的印象已經很糟糕了!對於這種情況,我想還是忍痛
希望他離開Portland,或許別的球隊會很需要他這樣的資質(而且肯
重用)。可惜啊!可惜啊!><
: How about Abdur-Rahim to Golden State for Nick Van Exel and
: Jason Richardson?
: Quick's take: "I'm not so sure about Jason fitting in, character
: wise. I haven't heard too much buzz about Jason
: Richardson."
關於這個rumor ,交易來的球員應該都不是符合拓荒者隊體質的
球員類型。J-Rich這名扣將對拓荒者隊而這算是多餘的,畢竟隊也有
一堆可以飛來飛去的球員,把他交易來對拓荒者隊沒有太大的實質幫
助;Nick Van Exel 是知名的老球皮,不過他的外線能力還沒有到很
棒的地步(頂多比MightyMouse 準一點),雖然人來瘋的時候很可怕
,但是他總不可能每場都人來瘋吧!XD
: If the Blazers are able to sign Brent Barry, would they still
: be interested in Wes Person?
: Quick's take: "I would put the percentage of Wesley coming
: back at 85%. I fully think that Barry and Person
: could co-exist."
這點我覺得算是可行的替代方案。若無法交易來Ray Allen ,或
許把目前聲勢看漲的Barry 交易來也是一個可以考慮的方案。另外如
果覺得三分砲臺太少的話,今夏成為自由球員的Person也是可以招攬
的三分球射手,不過我還是衷情於Allen 啦!XD
--
呼!挑了幾個我想回我話題來回應,希望大家不要看到睡著啊!XD
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.62.155.78
1F:推 mynowitzki:<(_ _)> 218.14.11.149 05/21
2F:推 Price:<(_ _)> 61.228.199.243 05/22