※ 引述《scad (Last chance!)》之銘言： : 原本題意不清 : 改一下比較簡單 : 不過另外要注意的是 : 前提是該球員五犯時 職員已告知其五犯(after having been notified) : 如果是職員沒有告知的狀況 : 又有不同的處理 : 詳細可以參考規則詮釋 : 或是桃園縣籃委會網站有中英對照 : : A隊教練已犯一次其本身之技術犯規(C). : : 之後A4犯滿替補出場,若A4在下一替補時 : : 機再度替補上場時,裁判未立刻發現,試問: : : (2)開錶後宣判A4犯規,發現此問題,裁判應如何處理? : Statement 5: : If, after having been notified of being no longer entitled to : participate because of a 5th foul, a player enters the game : again and scores a field goal, commits a foul, or is fouled by : an opponent before the illegal participation is discovered, the : field goal shall count and the foul shall be considered a player foul. : Example: : After having committed a 5th foul and having been notified of being no : longer entitled to participate, B4 enters the game again as a substitute. : B4's illegal participation is discovered after: : (a)B4 scores a field goal. : (b)B4 commits a foul. : (c)B4 is fouled by A4 (5th team foul). : Interpretation: : (a)The field goal scored by B4 shall count. : (b)The foul committed by B4 shall be considered a player foul. : (c)The two free throws merited by B4 shall be attempted by the : substitute for B4. : After all the activity connected with (a), (b), (c) is terminated, : the penalty for the technical foul of coach B (recorded as 'B') : shall be administered. yes... 所以(2)的狀況應該宣判如下... 1.A4犯規宣判球員犯規，累計球隊犯規次數，依據不同狀況(對方投籃動作球進與否? A隊團隊犯規次數, etc.)給予不同罰則 2.因A4五犯再度入場宣判教練技術犯規('B')，由B隊任一球員罰球兩次後外加控球權 同時 3.A4應立即替換下場 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 211.78.129.24