底下這篇 大家的評論還蠻好笑的 後來的投票結果是九成覺得 A’s 會比Giants的戰績好 ======== http://www.insidebayarea.com/search/ci_8726737?IADID=Search-www.insidebayarea.com-www.insidebayarea.com Same question, same answer As long as Sabean is running the show and Peter Magowan doesn't care about building a team from within or how people spend his money, the A's shall continue to remain in front of the Giants. 一樣的問題 一樣的答案 只要Sabean還在 A’s會一直領先Giants History, present agree on A's 從歷史看 A’s強 A's looking good early Count on this: Giants stink 靠這一點就夠了 Giants蠻差的 A's lost a lot of talent WHILE I expect both the A's and the Giants to finish with under .500 records this year, I would say the Giants win a few more games than the A's because the A's aren't gonna be as big without Nick Swisher, Mike Piazza or Shannon Stewart. 今年兩隊大概勝率都不會過半 可是 A’s 走太多人了 Giants的戰績會比較好 Rowand addition not enough 加了Rowand 還不夠 There's really no comparison THE A'S are going to win more games than the Giants because they are a much better team, 這兩隊沒法比吧 A’s比Giants好太多了 Price of losing steep BRIAN SABEAN will be the primary reason why the A's will win more games than the Giants. That guy is awful. His payroll is twice that of the A's, and he still can't field a contender. Sabean是主要的原因 A’s會贏的多 Young trumps old any day 年輕的會贏老的 Giants, meet mediocrity HOPE. THE A's have it, the Giants don't. It's that simple. The veteran Giants will do what their baseball cards say they'll do. Not much. The youthful A's on the other hand have no such reference point. Only promise, depth and Mr. Beane. 希望. A’s有, Giants 沒有. 就這麼簡單 巨人的球員 表現跟球員卡上講的一樣 A’s沒有參考點 有的是 承諾 深度 跟 Beane先生 Giants might be worst of all 巨人可能會是戰績最差的一年 A's all-around better THE A'S have a better pitching rotation, better overall defense and better hitting. They are simply a better team. A’s什麼都比較好 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 75.18.254.63 ※ 編輯: falstaff 來自: 75.18.254.63 (03/29 02:29)