※ 引述《Eslin ( 走走 )》之銘言： : 這是我還蠻好奇的點，到底什麼是尊重。畢竟無神論跟基督徒很多想法就是不同。 : 創世論與演化論，審判的有與無，神的有與無，以及更多版上論辯許久的話題。 : 質疑對方的思想基礎算不算尊重 : 譬如論證諾亞方舟根本不存在，神這種東西根本無法證明，然後另一派說末日神會 : 把這些不信祂的人通通丟到火湖裡，吵到最後大家火氣都很大，情緒性字眼都出現 : 後，就會有人說要尊重別人的信仰 : 我想所謂的「尊重」應該不是叫大家都不要質疑不要討論。若真是這樣，那無神論版 : 跟基督教版都可以不用玩了。 : 那所謂「尊重」的定義到底是什麼，界線又在哪裡。 Some people live with a strong value and are not hiding it from the crowd. I think that, basically, we should hide it at first because we're sensing that each of us has different views. Showing your values sometimes could be pushy. And some people think that being pushy is right because they hold the truth. But I think that there's no truth. But they could argue that that's finding excuses and not being honest. Basically I think that respecting others equals to respecting their values. However, sometimes we correct others. So, how do you recognize that it's time to accept or it's time to correct? Or, how do you know that you're "correcting"? It might be easier to solve this when it comes to bbs, since we don't know each other, and consequently we're not classified into social stratifications and are not recognized by gender, age, and education level. So we just blurt what we think of and don't care what that might affect others. I think the real question is that, do we or do we not have to treat others like we really do in the reality? If most of us think that, "Yes, we do", then maybe we could come out with some new rules that encourge people to behave more like we're facing with real people in the real world. However, in the real world, most of the time we take peaceful relationships over being honest. So that's really a contradiction and...probably we could have a vote. --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 123.193.1.15