※ 引述《windows2k (代替孟子來懲罰你)》之銘言： : 出線隊伍 下回還請附上消息來源 這篇看起來比較完整(我稍重排了一下) 發信人: hawking (賤), 信區: ACMICPC 標 題: Re: The teams advanced to 2005 ACM-ICPC Worl... 發信站: 飲水思源 (2004年12月10日12:13:47 星期五), 轉信 Marsha: The following is the recommended teams advancing to World Finals 2005. My explanation for the recommendation follows the list. The explanation is for our Asian Directors to understand the reasons behind it. And there is a warning to Asian Directors that we will use Professor Poucher's formula as a base next year for selecting teams to be advanced to Finals. Dhaka Site: (1) Fudan University C Aladdin (2)Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology-BUET Explorer Taipei Site: (3) Shanghai Jiaotong University C Spirit (4) The University of Hong Kong C HKUCS1 Seoul Site: (5) Seoul National University C Old Boy (6) Information and Communication University CIntensive Care Unit Manila Site: (7) University of Tokyo C Squeeze (8) Ateneo de Manila University C Res cogitans Beijing Site: (9) Tsinghua University C JHVH (10) Zhejiang University C Focus (11) Peking University C PKU_MonkeyKing Ehime Site: (12) Kyoto University C combat (13) Yonsei University C Artist Shanghai Site: (14) Renmin University of China C rruucc (15) National Taiwan University C orz Tehran Site: (16) Sharif University of Technology C The Stupendous (17) Amirkabir University of Technology CseKallePuk Bombay Site: (18) Nanyang Technological University- NTU Jammers (19) Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay- Bug Kanpur Site: (20) TBD on Dec 15 (21) TBD To: Asian Directors (I) Observations: * In Tehran and Seoul sites, both selected teams are domestic. In Taipei site, both seleted teams are foreign teams. The rest of you have one domestic and one foreign. Thanks to all of you for allowing foreign teams to participate. ? The actual allotment in Beijing is very under allotted. The actual allotment in Taipei and in Shanghai are also slightly under allotted. However the actual allotments in Manila and Kanpur is over allotted. See explanation below. (II) The situation of the wild cards allotment is not the same as that of 5-6 years ago. The competitions in all sites are very tough now. I no longer have luxury to allot something without a great reason. Thanks to Professor Poucher for giving Asia an extra team up to 21 this year. I am making the recommendation list above for the following reasons: Professor Poucher is giving us wild cards based on the combined scores of (1) the # of registered teams, (2) the # of universities, and (3) the # of teams solving at least one problem in the regional contest. We will use that formula as a base from next year (2005-2006) and on. This means some sites will have only one slot if the registration count is low. I will use a combined formula now as a transition which means minimum two teams for each site while I begin to apply the registration count. (1) The deserved slots for each site if calculated by the total registration count in all Asia sites: Dhaka 95 teams; deserved slot = 1.3 Taipei 181 teams; deserved slot = 2.3 Seoul 105 teams; deserved slot = 1.4 Manila 81 teams; deserved slot = 1.1 Beijing 361 teams; deserved slot = 4.7 Ehime 205 teams; deserved slot = 2.6 Tehran 141 teams; deserved slot = 1.8 Shanghai 255 teams; deserved slot = 3.2 Bombay 122 teams; deserved slot = 1.6 Kanpur 74 teams; deserved slot = 0.9 (2) If I choose the top N teams from each site for calculation which will include all of the above recommended teams, and if a university occupies more than one sites in the top teams, I will count as 0.5, or 0.25, then the actual allotment for each site (with deserved slots) will be: Dhaka top N = 2; actual allotted slots = 1.5 (1.3, 95) Taipei top N= 3; actual allotted slots = 1.75 (2.3, 181) Seoul top N= 2; actual allotted slots = 2.0 (1.4, 105) Manila top N= 2; actual allotted slots = 2.0 (1.1, 81)-- Beijing top N= 4; actual allotted slots = 2.75 (4.7, 361)++ Ehime top N= 3; actual allotted slots = 2.25 (2.6, 205) Tehran top N= 2; actual allotted slots = 2.0 (1.8, 141) Shanghai top N= 4; actual allotted slots = 2.75 (3.2, 255) Bombay top N= 2; actual allotted slots = 2.0 (1.6, 122) Kanpur top N= ?; actual allotted slots = 2.0 (0.9, 74)-- The “top N teams” item does not doubly count multiple teams from the same university. (3) If we were to use Professor Poucher’s formula as a base for this year, Manila and Kanpur sites would have gotten only one slot to World Finals. Please pay attention to this for next year. (4) Host card is not allotted this year. Seoul gave up. Other performed no very well or had used the privilege in the previous hosting. (5) I do not believe we will get 22 teams. If we do, the next slot will go to Beijing site which is ZhongShan University. Their teams are next to the top N teams in 4 sites. ( I hope Professor Poucher has one more mercy on this!) (6) You are welcome to pass this e-mail to anybody. (7) Thanks for good work and having a great year in Asia. (8) See YOU’LL in Shanghai ! From cj -- "聲音是聲音, icon 是 icon, 用 icon 來表示聲音的結果, 就是不知道哪個是聲音, 哪個是 icon. " 小光光 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.70.142.187