作者bushuang (不爽)
看板studyteacher
标题[高中] 松山农工英文科考题
时间Sat May 26 20:44:21 2018
I. Explain the following terms: 40%
Mitigating device
Interlanguage
Translanguage
Ellipsis Modality
II.20%
Sentence 1: If you require further information on the applicant, I would be pleased to do so.
Sentence 2: Mary liked the blue ones; I preferred the blue tiles.
a. What mistakes were made? What explanation would you give to students to avoid the same mistake?
b. What is substitution and ellipsis? (不很确定是不是问ellipsis?)
III.40%
What is CLIL（Content and Language Integrated Learning) approach? How would you use this approach in your class? What activities would you do to apply the CLIL approach in class? Do you think this approach is suitable for a ESL learners at vocational schools in Taiwan? Give specific reasons.
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 115.82.134.139
※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/studyteacher/M.1527338663.A.6E3.html
1F：推 calvinabcde: 教育考好多! 05/26 20:48
2F：→ crysdaisy: 这好偏 05/26 21:15
3F：→ ksjksj: 谢谢老师！ 05/26 21:16
4F：推 srx78404: 第一大题的名词解释应该是epistemic modality才对 05/26 21:29
5F：推 srx78404: 第二大题第二句是Mary liked the green ones; I preferr 05/26 21:31
6F：→ srx78404: ed the blue tiles. 05/26 21:31
7F：推 loveithree: 这考法好古早味@@ 05/26 21:31
8F：推 areucrazy543: 应该是松山工农XD 05/26 21:40
9F：推 calvinabcde: 看到打反也笑了XD 05/26 21:43
10F：推 changbaden: 第一大题是在考语言所吧… 05/26 22:06
11F：推 shiangyih: 超难 05/26 22:24
12F：推 Everettwu: 以为在考研究所...... 05/26 22:30
13F：→ bushuang: 我也觉得考这种题目没什麽意思 05/26 22:39
14F：推 baneter: 感觉是委外教授出的题目 05/26 22:45
15F：→ jeremiahncue: 量身订做的考题? 05/26 23:16
16F：→ jeremiahncue: 第一大题这样40分? 扯 05/26 23:17
17F：→ shiangyih: 的确考不太到高中英文教师应具备的能力… 05/26 23:19
18F：→ jeremiahncue: 忘了考文学所的题目，这样不太公平 05/26 23:23
19F：→ crysdaisy: 说实话这确实蛮容易让人联想可能是为专长特定领域的考 05/27 02:16
20F：→ crysdaisy: 生所出 05/27 02:16
21F：推 vanessa27: 以为在考研究所+1 05/27 10:26
22F：推 tyrosine123: 很明显出题者非常用心出题.知道这种高职学校需要的不 05/27 10:50
23F：→ tyrosine123: 是英文好的老师.而是非常有教育热诚而去念教育研究的 05/27 10:51
24F：→ tyrosine123: 老师。 05/27 10:51
25F：→ shiangyih: 楼上是反讽吗XD 05/27 12:38
26F：推 vicarious: 考文学题目才真的有事，高中英文根本碰不到真的英美文 05/27 13:14
27F：→ vicarious: 学。相较之下语言学还比较重要 05/27 13:14
28F：推 changbaden: 这题目究竟是想录取英文老师还是语言学者...？！ 05/27 13:26
29F：→ jeremiahncue: 高中英文有真的文学文本喔 05/27 14:51
30F：推 alvvays: 看T大推文都好舒压xd 05/27 15:22
31F：推 vicarious: 文学文本也是背单字考填空练文法。既然是这样语言学还 05/27 20:48
32F：→ vicarious: 比较有用，构词、句法至少比较有关联 05/27 20:48