作者Quinct ( 丁丁说干)
看板studyabroad
标题Re: [问题] 请问该如何回这位教授的信?
时间Sun Oct 30 14:26:17 2011
借题询问一下,
如果他回信写到:
Fine. Our procedure for application to our PhD program is
explained in the Department website. The first step is to
apply. If you are accepted and matriculate, you must have
formal interviews with at least 5 professors. This process
is for your protection. No professor can 'claim' a student
and no student is obligated to work with any professor.I
am ccing Prof. XXX who is the chair of our graduate
admissions committee.
前面我都懂,简单来说就是请你按步骤来。但最後一句我不是很了解,
cc的目的是要留案底说这学生不要收还是告知admissions committee
我曾经有和此位教授联系过,增加我录取的机率呢?
※ 引述《flamingJ (Crazy Driver)》之铭言:
: 目前在申请PhD
: 之前写信给UC Santa Barbara一位教授表明我的爱意
: 文末表示I have a complete CV if you wish to read more about me.
: I am looking forward to your reply.
: 等了一周没有回应,原本以为无望了,
: 没想到一周後教授回信了,
: I'm so pleased to hear of your interest in my research and the *** program
: at UCSB. Unfortunately, I am unable to respond personally to each prospective
: applicant, but here is some information about my work and the application
: process. I do plan to accept students this coming year, and I encourage you
: to apply. You should know that I am affiliated with the *** emphasis,
: and it would be unusual for me to admit students who apply to the ### or
: @@@ emphases.
: 好像有点希望? (虽然最後她有点误解,因为我没有打算走###或@@@领域)
: 很高兴教授鼓励我申请(至少有正面回应),
: 但不晓得该如何解读教授意思,以及接下来该怎麽回信>"< (好歹得回寄个CV呀)
: 各位高手可否给我一点您个人对这封信的见解及回信方向?
: ps.因为一些个人因素,专业领域名称必须先隐藏起来,不好意思:(
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 180.176.112.57