作者Iamaidiot (杂种...那又怎样)
看板politics
标题[情报] 一篇关於版友讨论时常犯错误的文章
时间Fri Sep 3 13:15:37 2004
http://www.intrepidsoftware.com/fallacy/attack.php
Attacking the Person (argumentum ad hominem)
Definition:
The person presenting an argument is attacked instead of the argument itself.
This takes many forms. For example,the person's character, nationality or
religion may be attacked. Alternatively, it may be pointed out that a person
stands to gain from a favourable outcome. Or, finally, a person may be attacked
by association, or by the company he keeps.
There are three major forms of Attacking the Person:
ad hominem (abusive): instead of attacking an assertion, the argument attacks
the person who made the assertion.
ad hominem (circumstantial): instead of attacking an assertion the author
points to the relationship between the person making the assertion and the
person's circumstances.
ad hominem (tu quoque): this form of attack on the person notes that a person
does not practise what he preaches.
Examples:
You may argue that God doesn't exist, but you are just following a fad. (ad
hominem abusive)
We should discount what Premier Klein says about taxation because he won't be
hurt by the increase. (ad hominem circumstantial)
We should disregard Share B.C.'s argument because they are being funded by the
logging industry. (ad hominem circumstantial)
You say I shouldn't drink, but you haven't been sober for more than a year. (
ad hominem tu quoque)
Proof:
Identify the attack and show that the character or circumstances of the person
has nothing to do with the truth or falsity of the proposition being defended.
References:
Barker: 166, Cedarblom and Paulsen: 155, Copi and Cohen: 97, Davis: 80
--
我...喜欢过你唷y^_^y
但是...请不要再出现在我梦里了
梦见你让我真的觉得很幸福
可是...梦里多幸福,醒来之後就多孤独
不过,还是要谢谢那段日子你给我的笑容跟谢谢你给我这场好梦
别了
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.139.130.137
1F:→ TMWSTW:那讨论基础在那里? 140.112.214.136 10/18
※ 编辑: Iamaidiot 来自: 220.139.133.38 (04/12 00:38)
※ 编辑: Iamaidiot 来自: 61.217.105.148 (11/18 12:33)
3F:推 namfish:罢免王金平 210.58.173.7 09/04 13:30
4F:→ namfish:推措 210.58.173.7 09/04 13:31
5F:→ chikiki:不知道哪个候选人选举连政见都提不出来 59.104.141.189 10/24 11:22
6F:推 chikiki:推错了,可以删掉吗? 59.104.141.189 10/24 11:30
7F:推 amperp:BALA 61.230.3.246 12/12 21:13
8F:推 amperp:BALA 61.230.3.246 12/12 21:23
9F:推 amperp:BALA 61.230.3.246 12/12 22:55
10F:推 amperp:大推 220.137.32.220 12/15 21:28
11F:→ sodier:公的肥肉包 ? 203.75.28.114 06/11 20:19
12F:推 wildtender:找不出论点 , 便做人生攻击 ,此真理也 140.117.201.66 06/22 07:58
13F:推 phantasm:回你一句话 这种心态台湾永远都不会进步 59.114.245.3 07/28 03:08
14F:→ phantasm:推错篇 抱歉 59.114.245.3 07/28 03:09
15F:→ shouri:叶菊兰 就是深绿急独的代表 苏贞昌反而不是 123.192.70.45 08/12 02:30
16F:→ ghostforever:泛蓝的根本连那网站都懒得上去,跟资 61.230.8.221 08/13 11:37
17F:→ ghostforever:讯又有何关系?一个不能代表任何事情 61.230.8.221 08/13 11:37
18F:→ ghostforever:的东西还奢望别人随你们起舞? 61.230.8.221 08/13 11:37
19F:→ ghostforever:...........推错篇了...-_- 61.230.8.221 08/13 11:38
20F:→ longstay:我是出了名的人来疯啊 哈哈 删218.174.152.125 10/06 21:22
21F:推 brea:这应该是邱毅和他有预谋 装的啦140.112.125.216 07/27 10:20
22F:→ nalee:民共和国 61.218.85.34 08/01 14:46
23F:推 moonshade:abc 198.182.56.5 08/19 13:26
24F:→ jeanvanjohn:那我投诉对方说我"洗脑过度",可以吗? 203.203.28.46 09/11 11:03
25F:推 airmike:从李登辉出走之後140.113.214.100 09/16 19:01
26F:→ airmike:推错.140.113.214.100 09/16 19:02
27F:推 ivanos:推错 219.70.173.229 10/05 10:48