作者retsam (filled with Mondays)
看板politics
标题Re: 鲍尔:公投没必要 两题都不支持吗?
时间Tue Feb 17 11:30:33 2004
※ 引述《okFed (ok连线Fed板)》之铭言:
: As the Deputy Secretary said in Beijing, referenda are generally reserved for
: very difficult and divisive issues, but the wording of these referenda is neither
: difficult nor particularly divisive....
: 如同副国务卿在北京所说,公投通常是保留来解决困难与分歧的议题,但这些公投
: (320的两题)既不困难也不特别分歧。
: 不知道我哪里看不清楚了?
为什麽不继续翻下去
The Secretary of State has noted that we are still studying the text of
President Chen's proposed referenda. We do not endorse any particular
referendum or phrasing, but we will wait to see the context, and how it
is used domestically in Taiwan.
: ※ 引述《okFed (ok连线Fed板)》之铭言:
: : 看到一个"We support referenda in principle"就高兴的以为刘屏说谎?
刘屏不只忽略那句完全忽略以上那句话 还有
" We do not endorse any particular referendum or phrasing,
but we will wait to see the context, and how it is used domestically
in Taiwan."
如果说看完刘屏的报导和看完整官方公文的感觉一模一样
那我也无话可说
我只想唤起一些还有良知 还肯思考的人
自己去检验你所接收的资讯真伪
--
There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must
never be a time when we fail to protest.
--Elie Wiesel
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 68.163.222.186
1F:→ nightwing:刘屏的报导很"客观" 不会"标题杀人法"-_- 推 210.58.43.112 02/17
2F:→ nightwing:中国时报的 "大记者" 唷 推 210.58.43.112 02/17
3F:→ BlueApex:怎麽Fed没有回应了... 推 140.112.25.150 02/17