个人意见， 我觉得这两个作者存在不存在，应该不会影响到作品本身的价值啦 如果说我是Homer worshipper or Shakespeare worshipper 我想我的预设立场会是因为该名称带出来的作品让我感动，与文化价值 所以我不会管作者是不是存在这事...（想到Barthes's the death of the author 里讲到的一些东西...） 不过像是textual criticism的批评家或许就会注意到who is the author. who edit the texts 等等相关问题 突然想到，不过好像也跟你问题没什麽关系 :) ※ 引述《fightback (to be)》之铭言： : My course of English Composition requires us to submit : a research paper with a certain topic. : I'd like to write about Homeric question with the conclusion : that Homer didn't exist. Accordingly, the idea flashes into my head. : I think of whether Shakespeare did exist that probably is usful to : support the thesis statement I want after my making the comparison and : analysis between Homer and Shkaespeare. : However, I have the problem that I'm not sure I did read the relevant : material, or why can't I find that kind of information now. : Can anybody give me a hand to tell me : is there the Shakespearian question with references if possible. : Homer是否存在为争议性的话题 : 有些学者认为Homer不过是个被创造出来的名词以解释 : Iliad and Odyssey作品的存在 : 这就是所谓的Homeric question. : 同样的 我印象中好像读过Shakespear也有被质疑 : 是否真有其人 或 众多剧本是否真为他所作 : 有些人提出 "Shakespeare" 不过是个众多无名小卒作品的挂名 : 我想请问: : 关莎士比亚这部分是我印象错误还是真的有此说? : 如果不是我印象错误的话 但好像又找不到"莎翁被质疑是否存在"相关资料 : 能否请众板友提供一下这方面资料. --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.134.76.43