作者vaakaa (我要欧趴)
看板comm_and_RF
标题Re: [问题] 微波和射频波之模型的差异
时间Wed Apr 17 21:52:21 2013
摘录一本大师写的讲义里的句子给大大参考:
Electromagnetic field is like a chameleon—its physics changes as the
frequency changes from static to optical frequencies.
Electromagnetics is described by fields—
a field is a function of 3D space and time.
These fields satisfy their respective PDEs that govern
their physics.
--------------------------------------------------------
When the object size is much less than the wavelength,
the physics of the field around it is dominated by the fact that the time derivative is unimportant compared
to the space derivative.
The field physics is close to that of static field.
In the mid-frequency regime, the space derivative is equally important
compared to the time derivative, but the size of the object,
and hence the boundary condition,
still controls the nature of the solution.
In the high-frequency regime,
the boundary condition plays a lesser role
compared to the equations in shaping the solution.
Hence, the solution resembles the
homogeneous solutions of electromagnetic equations,
which are plane waves. Plane waves are mathematical
representation of rays, and hence,
ray physics becomes more important in this regime.
-INTEGRAL EQUATION METHODS FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC AND ELASTIC WAVES
by Weng Cho Chew , Mei Song Tong and Bin Hu
A Publication in the Morgan & Claypool Publishers series
LECTURES ON COMPUTATIONAL ELECTROMAGNETICS #12
ISSN: 1932-1252
很抱歉我其实是来骗p币的XD 若有违反版规请板上大大提醒
※ 引述《saltlake (SaltLake)》之铭言:
: 射频波(radiofrequency)的行为
: 我们可以用电流的观念去模拟
: 讲得更复杂一点就是可以用拉普拉丝方程式去计算
: 而一旦频率更高到了微波领域
: 我们就必须考虑电磁波的观念
: 这时候有所谓波的近场和远场等差别
: 概念上不能再用电流的观念
: 可是
: 目前看到的书本不幸地都没有从理论方面更具体解释
: 为什麽射频波和微波这两类电磁波
: 不能都用马克士威方程式
: 从电磁波的角度去计算或了解?
: 或者说
: 有没有甚麽书或文章
: 有比较清楚详尽的数学推导
: 从马克士威方程式出发
: 然後根据电磁波频率的显着不同
: 导出射频波的行为是用拉普拉斯方程式?
: 谢谢
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.113.170.133
1F:→ vaakaa:这本书里有提到profyang大大前一篇提的观念140.113.170.133 04/17 21:55
2F:推 profyang:推~当频率很低时当然就是静电磁学 中频就140.112.247.141 04/17 22:01
3F:→ profyang:是我们电波组主要处理的频率 也就是要考140.112.247.141 04/17 22:01
4F:→ profyang:虑电路中的电磁波效应了 而他的高频则是140.112.247.141 04/17 22:02
5F:→ profyang:已经高到物理光学甚至几何光学的境界 那140.112.247.141 04/17 22:02
6F:→ profyang:就可以近似成平面波来处理140.112.247.141 04/17 22:03
7F:→ saltlake:感谢所供讯息 大大有用 :)118.169.239.225 04/18 17:05