学年学期 96学年度第2学期 开课单位 新闻硕一 新闻博一 新闻硕二 新闻博二 课程名称 (中)言说分析 (英)Discourse Analysis 授课教师 锺蔚文 职称 专任 教授 课程目标 教什麽? 传播必须透过言说进行，因此言说是传播的核心议题。 这门课的目的在培养监赏和批判 语言的能力，具体而言，在探讨各种分析言说的取径。 怎麽上课？ 沿袭我一贯的想法---知识是用来透视、诠释日常生活的。上课的主要活动有： 1.了解和比较言说分析各种取径，以学生报告和讲课两种方式进行。 2.检视个案如何进行言说分析以及其推理的方式和结构 3.从指定读物发现新问题 4.每星期指定2人（可全班轮流），提出书面和口头报告，口头报告以20 分钟为限。书面报告请制成powerpoint录音档（制作方式请参见网站 说明）， 於星期一晚十二时前送上本课网站，其他同学应先阅读报告， 并提出问题。 5.就当周指定文章提出报告，报告应包括以下几部分： （1）本周方法核心之理念； （2）如有资料分析，说明分析之程序和逻辑 6.应用本周方法，分析本年度主题资料，报告应包括以上几部分： （1）分析方法； （2）诠释； （3）结论。　 课程进度 2/19 课程介绍 2/26 言说分析是什麽？ 讨论问题： 请从上面、下面、左边、右边、前面、後面….从任何你认为可能的角度仔细读这个课程 大纲，看看能否发现其中有何奥秘？ #锺蔚文. (2003). 想像语言:从Saussure到台湾经验. 出自传播学的想像. 台北: 巨流出版社, pp. 236—253; pp. 228-236.. #Taylor, S. (2001). Locating and conducting discourse analytic research. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis (pp. 5-48). Milton Keynes: Sage. Jaworski, Adam; & Coupland, Nikolas. (1999)(Eds.). The Discourse Reader. London and New York: Routledge, “Introduction: Perspectives on discourse analysis”, pp. 1-44. Hammersley, M. (2002). Discourse anlaysis: A bibliographical guide. www.cf.ac.uk. Lakoff, R. T. (2003). Nine ways of looking at apologies: The necessity for interdisciplinary theory and method in discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 199-214). Oxford: Blackwell. Kitzinger, C., & Frith, H. (2001). Just say no? The use of Conversation Analysis in developing a feminist perspective on sexual refusal. Discourse & Society, 10(3), 293-316. 一、研究取径 3/4 结构分析 (交研究提案) #锺蔚文. (2003). 想像语言:从Saussure到台湾经验. 出自传播学的想像. 台北: 巨流出版社, pp. 201-209 # Saussure, F. d. (1996). The object of linguistics. In P. Cobley (Ed.), The Communication Theory Reader . London and New Yori: Rotledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 37-47. # Saussure, F. d. (1996). Linguistics value. In P. Cobley (Ed.), The Communication Theory Reader . London and New Yori: Rotledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 99-114. Rose， Gillian. 王国强译. (2006). Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials. (视觉研究导论: 影像的思考). 台卝: 群学出版社， 第四章，“符号学”，pp. 89-130. van Dijk, Chap. 17, “Structure of news”, pp. 17-59. Barthes, R. (1963). Introduction to the structural analysis of narratives. In S. Sontag (Ed.), A Barthes Reader (pp. 251-295). New York: Hill and Wang. 3/11 Foucault式分析 # 锺蔚文. (2003). 想像语言:从Saussure到台湾经验. 出自传播学的想像. 台北: 巨流出版社, pp. 220-228. # Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaelogy of Knowledge. Trans. Smith, S. London: Tavistock, Appendix, “The discourse on language”, pp. 215-39(当代杂志有译文 ，连载中) # Rose， Gillian. 王国强译. (2006). Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials. (视觉研究导论: 影像的思考). 台卝: 群学出版社， 第五章，“论述分析I”，pp. 177-212; 第六章, “论述分析II” , pp. 213-240. #Carabine, J. (2001). Unmarried motherhood 1830-1990: A genealogical analysis. In M. Wetherell & S. Taylor & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis (pp. 267-310). London: Sage. 黄金麟. (2000). 历史、身体、国家---近代中国的身体形成---1895-1937. 台北: 联经. Ball, Stephen J. 黄静文译．　(1996)．　出自香港岭南学院翻译系（编）学科．知识 ．权力．　牛津大学出版社，””管理学: 一种道德技术”, 页93-112. 3/18 批判言说分析（交第一次分析习作） #锺蔚文. (2003). 想像语言:从Saussure到台湾经验. 出自传播学的想像. 台北: 巨流出版社, pp. 216-221. # Halliday, M. A. K. (1996). ‘Introuduction’, Language as social semiotic: the social interpretation of language and meaning. In P. Cobley (Ed.), The Communication Theory Reader (pp. 37-47). London and New Yori: Rotledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 88-98. # Fairclough, N. (2001). The discourse of New Labour: Critical Discourse Analysis. In M. Wetherell & S. Taylor & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis (pp. 229-266). London: Sage. # Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading Images: The Grammar of Graphic Design. London: Routledge. Meyer, M. (2001). Between theory, method, and politics: positioning of the approaches to CDA. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 14-31). London: Sage. 倪炎元（1999）。〈再现的政治：解读媒介对他者负面建构的策略〉， 《新闻学研究》 ，58：85-112。 3/25 言说心理学 # Philips, L., & Jorgensen, M. W. (2002). Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage, pp. 96-137. # Edley, N. (2001). Analysing masculinity: Interpretative repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions. In M. Wetherell & S. Taylor & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis (pp. 189-228). London: Sage. 4/1 认知语言学 # Lee, D. A. (2003). Constructivist processes in discourse: A cognitive linguistics perspective. In H. Van den Berg, M. Wetherell & H. Houtkoop-Steenstra (Eds.), Analyzing Race Talk: Multidisciplinary Approaches to the Interview (pp. 49-63). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Lakoff, G., & Kovecses, Z. (1987). The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In M. Quinn & D. Holland (Eds.), Cultural Models in Language and Thought (pp. 195-221). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. 4/6 实践导向分析（交第二次分析习作） # 锺蔚文. (2003). 想像语言:从Saussure到台湾经验. 出自传播学的想像. 台北: 巨流出版社, pp. 209-216. # Volosinov, V. N. (1996). Toward a Marxist philosophy of language. In P. Cobley (Ed.), The Communication Theory Reader (pp. 70-87). London and New York: Routledge, pp. 70-87. # Hutchins, E., & Palen, L. (1997). Constructing meaning from space, gesture, and speech. In L. B. Resnick, R. Saljo, C. Pontecorvo & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, Tools, and Reasoning: Essays on Situated Cognition (pp. 23-40). Berlin: Springer. Couldry, N. (2004). Theorising media as practice. Social Semiotics, 14(2), 115-132. 二、语言元素 4/15 对话分析 # Wooffitt, R. (2001). Researching psychic practitioners: Conversation Analysis. In M. Wetherell & S. Taylor & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis (pp. 49-92). London: Sage. ＃Clayman, S. E. (1992). Footing in the achievement of neutrality: the case of news-interview discourse. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (pp. 163-198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Turnbull, W. (2003). Language in Action: Psychological Models of 　Conversation. Hove and New York: Psychology Press，Chap. 6, "conversation analysis", pp. 140-210. 4/22 文体(Genre) # Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Chap. 3, “The concept of genre”, pp. 33-67. Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech(70), 151-176. 4/29 叙述体(Narrative) # Ochs, Elinor. (1997). Narrative. In Teun A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as Structure and Process. London: Sage, pp. 185-207. Ryan, Marie-Laure. (2006). Avatars of Story. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, Chap. 1, “Narrative, media, and modes”, pp. 3-30. Scholes, Robert; Phelan, James, & Kellogg, Robert. 2006. The Nature of Marrative. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bell, A. (1994). Telling stories. In D. Graddol & O. Boyd-Barrett (Eds.), Media Texts: Authors and Readers (pp. 100-118). Clevedon: The Open University. 萧阿勤. (2005). 台湾文学的本土化典范：　历史叙事、策略的本质主义与国家权力。文 化研究，　创刊号，　页97-146. 5/6 隐喻(Metaphor) ＃Lakoff, George; & Johnson, Mark. (1980). Metaphors We Live by. Chicago & London: The Univ. of Chicago Press, Chap. 1-3, pp. 3-13; Chap. 7-8, pp. 31-40; Chap. 12-13, pp. 56-68.　（有中译本） Kovecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 3-42. Sontag, Susan. 刁筱华．（2000）． 疾病的隐喻．台北：大田出版． 5/13 语法、字汇、观点（交第三次分析习作） # Martin, J. R. (2002). Grace: the loggenesis of freedom. In M. Toolan (Ed.), Critical Discourse Analysis: Critical Concepts in Linguistics (Vol. III, pp. 170-201). London and New York: Routledge. Halliday, M. A. K. (2002). On the grammar of pain. In M. Toolan (Ed.), Critical Discourse Analysis: Critical Concepts in Linguistics (pp. 303-330). London and New York: Routledge. 陈烜之, 邓少林, & 梁展豪. (1995). 两岸三地常用中文字汇比较研究. 中华心 理学报, 37(2), 169-177. van Leeuwen, T. (1995). Representing social action. Discourse & Society, 6(1), 81-106. Fang, Y.-j. (1994). 'Riots' and demonstrations in the Chinese press: A case study of language and ideology. Discourse & Society, 5(4), 463-482. 三、主题（暂定，视学生兴趣而定） 5/20 仇恨、歧视的语言 Fernandez-Armesto, F. (2007). 我们人类: 人类追寻自我价值及定位的历史 (赖盈满, Trans.). 台北: 左岸. Buruma, I. (2006). 罪孽的报应: 日本和德国的战争记忆与反思(1945-1993) (戴晴, Trans.). 北京: 社会科学文献出版社. Ana, O. S. (1999). 'Like an animal I was treated': anti-immigrant metaphor in US public discourse. Discoure & Society, 10(2), 191-224. Wetherell, M. (2003). Racism and the analysis of cultural resources in interviews. In H. Van den Berg, M. Wetherell & H. Houtkoop-Steenstra (Eds.), Analyzing Race Talk: Multidisciplinary Approaches to the Interview (pp. 11-30). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Teo, P. (2000). Racism in the news: A critical discourse analysis of news reporting in two Australian newspapers. Discoure & Society, 11(4), 7-49. 5/27　语言中的创意 Carter, R. (2004). Language and Creativity: The Art of Common Talk. London and New York: Routledge. Carter, R., & Nash, W. (1990). Seeing Through Language: A Guide to Styles of English Writing. Oxford: Blackwell. 6/3　多媒体语言 Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the New Media Age. London and New York: Routledge. Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images : the grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. 6/10 如何评估言说分析?/未来研究方向 # 锺蔚文. (2003). 想像语言:从Saussure到台湾经验. 出自传播学的想像. 台北: 巨流出版社, pp. 251-258. ＃Taylor, S. (2001). Evaluating and applying discourse analytic research. In M. Wetherell & S. Taylor & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis (pp. 311-330). London: Sage. 6/27 缴交期末报告 课程要求/评分标准 个人作业 本学期作业包括以下等项： 1.研究计划：每人择一主题（例如：断背山、火星文、教室言说、统独言论、性骚扰语 言、专制语言、外劳、管理言说等，资料无所不在！），也可以已出版之 论文为对象，重新设计和分析。研究计划以2页为限，请说明主题背景、 研究动机、以及资料之来源和范围。 2.分析习作：蒐集相关语料，从所探讨言说分析取径中选择三种加以分析，每一取径自 成一小报告，并定期缴交。每一小报告以五页为限。 3.学期报告： (1)学期报告应整合三篇小报告，并补充不足之处，提出分析之定稿。 (2)创作: 发挥创意，「发现」或发明语言的新品种。 以上作业缴交日期见课程大纲。 评分标准: 上课（包括网站）参与 30% 分析习作　　　　　　 30% 期末研究报告 20% 期末创作 20% --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 59.115.177.130