https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpenLsHEHaY 这个网红说 「美国需要长度更长载重量更大的卡车,以提高载货效率,也能降低运输成本和物价」 「美国从雷根在1980年代放宽全国各州的拖车(不包含拖车头)最大合法总重量上限到 80000磅,之後就已经有40多年没更改道路运输相关法规,让卡车可以拖更长的拖车和载更 多更重的货物」 「瑞典芬兰已经通过新法律,允许长度更长(70公尺),总重量120吨的卡车上路,美国呢?」 我也觉得川普应该考虑签署行政命令.让美国各州能允许长度更长载重量更大的联结车上路 -- 「何というかな。ああ、生まれて来てよかった、そう思うことが何べんかあるだろう 。そのために生きてんじゃねえか。そのうちお前にもそういう时が来るよ、な？　まぁ 、がんばれ」。 男はつらいよ 39作目 寅次郎物语 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 114.24.74.62 (台湾) ※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/car/M.1746844646.A.CA8.html 这篇下面还有一段回文好狠 One VERY crucial detail was missing: US trucks are poorly made and designed. They are 20 years behind the rest of the world. Driver comfort in EU trucks is on another level, cabin noise is decimated. They maintenance cycles are longer, they have cleaner emissions while using less moving parts to do it, engines have more power, better fuel efficiency and they run cleaner because they have better tolerances. There is no real magic in the engines: they are just BETTER MADE! And US regulations do not allow those trucks to be used because they are simpler in design. USA demands a certain way of doing things that is archaic and make the engines run dirtier and provide less power and wear out sooner. Just looking at the frame alone, US truck industry install all the air lines etc and then just sprays paint all over EVERYTHING. It is the cheapest way to build it. It means unpainted surfaces are left behind, and all your connectors are caked in paint. Doing it the hard way, painting it and then installing everything is more expensive. Absolutely NO truck buyer accepts that in Europe. In USA? They have no choice. You can not see that anywhere in the world anymore, it is really something that belongs to the 80s. US semi truck industry is fully insular, you can't import. This is what is going to happen to every US industry with tariffs. They will stop innovating when their entire market is just USA and they have captive audience: you don't have a choice. So.. why would they put any money on research and development? 以下用Google翻译: 「缺少一个非常关键的细节：美国卡车的制造和设计都很糟糕。他们比世界其他地区落後 20年。欧盟卡车的驾驶舒适度达到了另一个水平，驾驶室噪音也大大降低。它们的维护周 期更长，排放更清洁，同时使用的运动部件更少，引擎功率更大，燃油效率更高，并且由 於具有更好的耐受性，因此运行更清洁。引擎并没有真正的魔力：它们只是做得更好！美 国法规不允许使用这些卡车，因为它们的设计更简单。美国要求采用某种过时的做事方式 ，使引擎运转更脏，提供的动力更少，磨损更快。 仅看车架，美国卡车工业安装了所有空气管路等，然後在所有东西上喷漆。这是最便宜的 建造方式。这意味着未涂漆的表面会被留下，并且所有连接器都会沾上油漆。比较困难的 方法是，先喷漆，然後安装所有东西，成本更高。在欧洲，绝对没有卡车买家接受这一点 。在美国？他们别无选择。在世界任何地方你都看不到了，这确实是属於80年代的东西。 美国半卡车产业完全孤立，无法进口。这就是每个受到关税影响的美国产业都会发生的情 况。当他们的整个市场都在美国并且他们拥有忠实的受众时，他们将停止创新：你别无选 择。那麽……他们为什麽要在研发上投入资金呢？」 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 看来美国的商用车比起美国的汽车/重机,跟世界潮流的脱节更大,更没竞争力 ※ 编辑: yamatobar (114.24.74.62 台湾), 05/11/2025 01:04:22