car 板


LINE

看板 car  RSS
看了一下原文 https://www.iihs.org/news/detail/iihs-researchers-find-little-benefit-from-kne e-airbags Airbags are essential, lifesaving devices that have prevented tens of thousand s of deaths. More airbags, one might assume, would provide even greater protec tion. 汽车安全气囊是一个拯救数万人的安全设备。 人们可以推论,安全气囊越多,防护能力越好。 That isn’t always the case, a recent IIHS study shows. One increasingly commo n type of airbag — the knee airbag — has a negligible effect on injury risk and, in fact, may even increase it in some cases, researchers found. 但是最近IIHS对於现在越来越常见的膝部气囊的研究表露了不同於一般的结果。 研究指出膝部气囊对於降低受伤风险是微不足道的,甚至在特定的案例中有增加受伤机率 的风险 Knee airbags usually deploy from the lower dashboard and are intended to distr ibute impact forces to reduce leg injuries. They may also help reduce forces o n an occupant's chest and abdomen by controlling lower body movement. 膝部气囊作用於仪表板下方 可以分散下方的冲击力道减少腿部受伤的情形 甚至有可能在冲击中 藉由控制下半身在冲击中的运动 来减轻人员胸腹部的压力 To find out if knee airbags improve safety, IIHS researchers examined both cra sh test data and information from real-world crash reports. 为了了解膝部气囊实际引响,IIHS的研究人员 检视了撞击测试跟现实车祸的资料 For the first part, they looked at injury measures from more than 400 frontal crash tests conducted as part of the IIHS vehicle ratings program to see if in juries were less likely when vehicles were equipped with knee airbags. 低一部分: 在撞击测试方面 IIHS检视了超过400笔自己所进行的前方撞击测试 来比对装配了膝部气囊的汽车是否真的能降低受伤机率 To look at real-world outcomes, they compiled crash reports from 14 states and compared injury risk in vehicles with knee airbags with risk in vehicles with out knee airbags. 而现实车祸方面 IIHS则收集了北美14州的车祸资料 来比对有装备膝部气囊的车跟没装配膝部气囊的车的受伤机率 Knee airbags had only a small effect on injury measures recorded by dummies in IIHS driver-side small overlap front and moderate overlap front crash tests. In the small overlap test, knee airbags were associated with increased injury risk for lower leg injuries and right femur injuries, though head injury risk was slightly reduced. The airbags had no effect on injury measures in the mod erate overlap test. 结果表明 再撞击测试中 膝部气囊对於前方撞击的影响非常有限 在驾驶侧小面积撞击中 膝部气囊会增加小腿以及右股骨的受伤风险 但是头部受伤的风险确些微减少 然而在40%中等撞击测试中则没明显影响。 In the analysis of real-world crashes, knee airbags reduced overall injury ris k by half a percentage point, from 7.9 percent to 7.4 percent, but this result wasn’t statistically significant. 然後,在实际车祸中 膝部气囊让平均受伤机率从7.9%减少至7.4% 一共减少了0.5个百分点 但是这个些微的差距并没统计上的意义 “There are many different design strategies for protecting against the kind o f leg and foot injuries that knee airbags are meant to address,” says Becky M ueller, an IIHS senior research engineer and co-author of the paper. “Other o ptions may be just as, if not more, effective.” 本研究的共同作者,IIHS的资深研究人员Becky Mueller指出 ”除了膝部气囊外,还有很多设计能减少腿部伤害” ”其它的设计也一样有效” One reason some manufacturers have been installing knee airbags is to help veh icles pass federally mandated tests with unbelted dummies. It’s possible that knee airbags would help unbelted occupants in real-world crashes. The IIHS st udy didn’t look specifically at crashes in which people weren’t using seat b elts, and dummies are always belted in IIHS vehicle ratings tests. 有些厂商装置膝部气囊的主要原因是希望自己的车辆能够通过未系安全带的联邦测试 在现实车祸中 膝部气囊或许有能力降低未系安全的乘客受伤风险 但在IIHS的现实车祸资料中 并没有精细研究未系安全带跟有系安全带的差别。 而在实验室撞侧中,所有假人都是有系上安全带的 心得: 感觉原文的意思是气囊数并不一定是选车的重要指标,而膝部气囊的影响并不大 或许是google翻译不准 感觉文章只是叙事,没有太多起伏 --



※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 72.49.32.8 (美国)
※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/car/M.1565418097.A.3EB.html ※ 编辑: MunezSu (72.49.32.8 美国), 08/10/2019 14:27:01
1F:推 dcoog7880: 推 08/10 14:28
2F:推 dslite: 军备竞赛必需品 08/10 14:30
3F:推 stone0504: 推 08/10 14:39
4F:推 jackeighteen: 推热心翻译 08/10 14:45
5F:→ ASKA: 看内文感想就是 不系安全带时 也许有用。不过有谁开车不 08/10 14:49
6F:→ ASKA: 系安全带啊? 08/10 14:49
7F:推 T8: 感谢大大热心翻译 让乡民能把问题理解至精确! 08/10 14:51
8F:推 assblack: 骑车都有人敢不戴安全帽了 开车不系安全带的一定比你想 08/10 14:55
9F:→ assblack: 的更多 08/10 14:55
10F:推 wa88: 推热心翻译 谢谢 08/10 15:02
11F:推 PsMonkey: 推楼上,你看到现在还有人在卖安全带便利扣就知道啦 08/10 15:04
12F:推 supereva: 不系安全带还比什麽安全 最低标准都没有 08/10 15:13
13F:推 supereva: 连安全带都不系的人 不会去管什麽iihs的 08/10 15:17
14F:推 VOY: 开车敢不系安全带的人应该不会特别去挑一台有膝部气囊的车.. 08/10 15:26
15F:推 sGuitar: 安全带便利扣真的超低能 08/10 15:27
16F:推 abcde78555: 我就看过BMW没系的啊,应该有膝部气囊吧 08/10 16:06
17F:→ Ekmund: 最基本的安全带还是最猛呀 08/10 16:42
18F:推 wallholla: 看起来是装了膝部气囊是Z>B 08/10 16:49
19F:推 windowdoor: 心灵防护+10 老话一句 进口有测撞>>>>>六球国产>>· 08/10 16:55
20F:→ windowdoor: ····>>两球 08/10 16:55
21F:推 evo2001: IIHS的公信力很够,的确是能做为参考 08/10 18:38
22F:推 hcshin: 不准? 不准? 08/10 19:39
23F:推 missin: 驾驶坐比较躺的姿势会比较有用 08/10 20:36
24F:推 JEON: 本来就不是很重要 08/10 22:22
25F:推 dc47dc: 7.9到7.4这个误差率范围 08/11 01:02
26F:推 hasebe: 他数据就说了目前看起来没显着帮助阿 08/11 09:44
27F:→ hasebe: 和安全带不能比 08/11 09:44
28F:推 hasebe: 安全带那段应该是说,膝气囊对没系有帮助 08/11 09:46
29F:推 yuinghoooo: 後排侧气囊比较重要了吗 08/12 00:42







like.gif 您可能会有兴趣的文章
icon.png[问题/行为] 猫晚上进房间会不会有憋尿问题
icon.pngRe: [闲聊] 选了错误的女孩成为魔法少女 XDDDDDDDDDD
icon.png[正妹] 瑞典 一张
icon.png[心得] EMS高领长版毛衣.墨小楼MC1002
icon.png[分享] 丹龙隔热纸GE55+33+22
icon.png[问题] 清洗洗衣机
icon.png[寻物] 窗台下的空间
icon.png[闲聊] 双极の女神1 木魔爵
icon.png[售车] 新竹 1997 march 1297cc 白色 四门
icon.png[讨论] 能从照片感受到摄影者心情吗
icon.png[狂贺] 贺贺贺贺 贺!岛村卯月!总选举NO.1
icon.png[难过] 羡慕白皮肤的女生
icon.png阅读文章
icon.png[黑特]
icon.png[问题] SBK S1安装於安全帽位置
icon.png[分享] 旧woo100绝版开箱!!
icon.pngRe: [无言] 关於小包卫生纸
icon.png[开箱] E5-2683V3 RX480Strix 快睿C1 简单测试
icon.png[心得] 苍の海贼龙 地狱 执行者16PT
icon.png[售车] 1999年Virage iO 1.8EXi
icon.png[心得] 挑战33 LV10 狮子座pt solo
icon.png[闲聊] 手把手教你不被桶之新手主购教学
icon.png[分享] Civic Type R 量产版官方照无预警流出
icon.png[售车] Golf 4 2.0 银色 自排
icon.png[出售] Graco提篮汽座(有底座)2000元诚可议
icon.png[问题] 请问补牙材质掉了还能再补吗?(台中半年内
icon.png[问题] 44th 单曲 生写竟然都给重复的啊啊!
icon.png[心得] 华南红卡/icash 核卡
icon.png[问题] 拔牙矫正这样正常吗
icon.png[赠送] 老莫高业 初业 102年版
icon.png[情报] 三大行动支付 本季掀战火
icon.png[宝宝] 博客来Amos水蜡笔5/1特价五折
icon.pngRe: [心得] 新鲜人一些面试分享
icon.png[心得] 苍の海贼龙 地狱 麒麟25PT
icon.pngRe: [闲聊] (君の名は。雷慎入) 君名二创漫画翻译
icon.pngRe: [闲聊] OGN中场影片:失踪人口局 (英文字幕)
icon.png[问题] 台湾大哥大4G讯号差
icon.png[出售] [全国]全新千寻侘草LED灯, 水草

请输入看板名称,例如:BabyMother站内搜寻

TOP