作者xiaoa (不事生产)
看板ask-why
标题Re: [请益] 为什麽会觉得乱伦恶心呢
时间Fri Jun 16 14:23:59 2017
※ 引述《souldragon (依法不依人)》之铭言:
: → ghjkl5566: 看吧 又在从头空口白话到尾 我没说你不能提出质疑 科学 06/16 11:49
: → ghjkl5566: 本来就容许质疑的 但!要质疑请提出相关佐证、文献 06/16 11:49
: → ghjkl5566: 且人家回答了你 又反问你时 请提出相关事证 而不是像你 06/16 11:50
Westermarck (1921) hypothesized that proximity to others during development
serves as a cue to biological relatedness and hence is critical for sibling
sexual aversion (the “Westermarck effect”). The most commonly cited example
of the Westermarck effect in humans comes from data acquired from Israeli
kibbutzim, in which participants were found to be unlikely to marry, or to
feel sexual desire for, individuals from the communal peer group in which
they were raised (Shepher 1971, 1983).
These findings, however, have recently
been questioned by Shor and Simchai (2009) who report in-depth interviews
with adults who grew up in the kibbutzim communal education system revealing
virtually no sexual aversion toward peers (reviewed in Rantala and
Marcinkowska 2011).
如果你是觉得我说话都像在放屁
那就算了
佐证? 当我没说过,反正我都在放屁嘛
: → ghjkl5566: 这种从头空口问问问 问就算了 人家答你後的反诘 你只会 06/16 11:50
: → ghjkl5566: 用更多问题去塞 这种不叫讨论 根本 浪~费~时~间 06/16 11:51
: → ghjkl5566: 至於什麽你看不出来 八拉巴拉的 那是你的问题 怪我罗? 06/16 11:51
: → xiaoa: "要质疑请提出相关佐证"那就不叫质疑了,那叫反驳。质疑本 06/16 14:14
: → xiaoa: 身就只是提出逻辑推论上可能有矛盾的地方,所以才会质"疑" 06/16 14:15
--
Nothing is true, everything is permitted -- the Assassin's Creed
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 118.100.91.149
※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/ask-why/M.1497594244.A.252.html
1F:嘘 a001ou: 就酱?这种吵架文不会私信腻 06/16 16:08
2F:→ xiaoa: 因为节录的部分太长,不然我也不想发文 06/17 01:25
3F:推 Ebergies: 讨论的时候若可心平气和较能达到要的效果喔。共勉之 06/17 11:06
4F:→ ghjkl5566: 对麻~这样把佐证文献拿出来不是很好吗? 为何一定要 06/18 05:53
5F:→ ghjkl5566: 别人说了你才肯做? 但还是谢谢你提供文献 研究後若有 06/18 05:53
6F:→ ghjkl5566: 心得定当上来分享 06/18 05:54
7F:→ xiaoa: 这不是我提供的文献,是别人贴了,你没有看,谢谢。 06/18 14:38
8F:→ KanoLoa: 56是不是习惯性觉得别人抱有恶意啊?讨论好好的都会忽然 08/24 08:53
9F:→ KanoLoa: 暴走 08/24 08:53