※ 引述《deathmare510 (阿彦)》之铭言： : 为何这世界的异性恋占大多数呢？我认为是因为人们在幼年时期，渐渐的认知到自己的性 : 别角色，从而去模仿男生或女生的行为，产生我是男（女）生，应该要喜欢女（男）生， : 这种想法。简单来说，我认为孩童在幼年时性别角色认知错误，才会变成同性恋（欢迎纠 : 正），有人可能会反驳同性恋是因为男（女）生的灵魂跑到女（男）生的身体，但是性别 : 的不同是身体上的差别，灵魂本身并没有性别之分，再说有没有灵魂这种东西也是一大问 : 号。如果同性伴侣领养了小孩，小孩在成长的过程会模仿大人的举止，造成下ㄧ代原本是 : 异性恋的儿童变成同性恋的机率极高，我认为这样对那些孩童是很不公平的。不知道各位 : 乡民怎麽看？ 关於同性恋父母收养子女，是否比较容易变成同性恋者 顺带也提到歧视问题 美国精神医学会已经有正式的对外报告 http://www.apa.org/about/policy/parenting.aspx 以下是段落转录，以色标指出你想了解的部分 As the social visibility and legal status of lesbian and gay parents has increased, three major concerns about the influence of lesbian and gay parents on children have been often voiced (Falk, 1994; Patterson, Fulcher & Wainright, 2002). One is that the children of lesbian and gay parents will experience more difficulties in the area of sexual identity than children of heterosexual parents. For instance, one such concern is that children brought up by lesbian mothers or gay fathers will show disturbances in gender identity and/or in gender role behavior. A second category of concerns involves aspects of children's personal development other than sexual identity. For example, some observers have expressed fears that children in the custody of gay or lesbian parents would be more vulnerable to mental breakdown, would exhibit more adjustment difficulties and behavior problems, or would be less psychologically healthy than other children. A third category of concerns is that children of lesbian and gay parents will experience difficulty in social relationships. For example, some observers have expressed concern that children living with lesbian mothers or gay fathers will be stigmatized, teased, or otherwise victimized by peers. Another common fear is that children living with gay or lesbian parents will be more likely to be sexually abused by the parent or by the parent's friends or acquaintances. Results of social science research have failed to confirm any of these concerns about children of lesbian and gay parents (Patterson, 2000, 2004a; Perrin, 2002; Tasker, 1999). Research suggests that sexual identities (including gender identity, gender-role behavior, and sexual orientation) develop in much the same ways among children of lesbian mothers as they do among children of heterosexual parents (Patterson, 2004a). Studies of other aspects of personal development (including personality, self-concept, and conduct) similarly reveal few differences between children of lesbian mothers and children of heterosexual parents (Perrin, 2002; Stacey & Biblarz, 2001; Tasker, 1999). However, few data regarding these concerns are available for children of gay fathers (Patterson, 2004b). Evidence also suggests that children of lesbian and gay parents have normal social relationships with peers and adults (Patterson, 2000, 2004a; Perrin, 2002; Stacey & Biblarz, 2001; Tasker, 1999; Tasker & Golombok, 1997). The picture that emerges from research is one of general engagement in social life with peers, parents, family members, and friends. Fears about children of lesbian or gay parents being sexually abused by adults, ostracized by peers, or isolated in single-sex lesbian or gay communities have received no scientific support. Overall, results of research suggest that the development, adjustment, and well-being of children with lesbian and gay parents do not differ markedly from that of children with heterosexual parents. 以上内容，你可以仔细阅读研究的报告，不要再去查什麽网友或人们的答案了 另外，性向是天生的，也是已经有众多的研究报告支持 若你有兴趣，我也可以再找给你 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 115.43.55.138 ※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/ask-why/M.1495718558.A.165.html ※ 编辑: Wengboyu (115.43.55.138), 05/25/2017 21:26:36 你想要相信谁，我没办法多说什麽 风向新闻一向是个色彩很鲜明的媒体，而它引用的是一个宗教期刊 如同Ebergies所说，那并没有足够的credit，更何况根本不是科学期刊 也就是说它没有经过其他生、心理科学研究者的peer review 那有什麽好说的? 假造或选择性忽略某些数据，根本无从检验起 它呈现给你的就是他想让你看到的 又或者只是通过的宗教研究者的peer review 也许会退件或删除一些他们认为「不合适」的内容 另外，那位霍普金斯的「学者」(我甚至不知道他够不够格)，如果我没记错 他的前同事(?)好像还为此事在网路上架起网页，去反驳质疑他，一时间找不到网页 我引列的是美国精神医学会对外发布的，好歹也是全美的精神科医师学会 它所引的社会、心理学研究报告，都来自有头有脸的科学期刊 也不是只有一篇这样讲，而是数篇都支持一样的结果 你若想要支持同性恋是後天的，就去新英格兰医学期刊、心理学相关期刊 或者生理学研究的期刊里，找出起码有2-3篇支持同性恋是後天的 才会有一些说服力 而且你可能有什麽误会，美国精神医学会并没有说同性恋是先天或後天 它只是澄清了双亲的性取向并不会影响受领养孩子的性取向 而就算同性恋是後天的，那也不影响同志双亲领养小孩 不知道你懂不懂得这之间的差异 不过事已至此，你若要坚持认为风向新闻那则是正确的，我也无可置喙 ※ 编辑: Wengboyu (115.43.55.138), 05/26/2017 06:07:12