02年韩国的荒谬裁判 被黑到现在 这次荒谬程度应该算超过那时候了 美国是打算被黑一辈子吗 FIFA自己都对政治干涉足球的事情有严格规定 就拿今年尼泊尔足协被FIFA全球禁赛的事情来说 也是因为尼泊尔政治干涉足协事务被FIFA禁赛 结果这次FIFA自己就违反这规定 因为川普一个电话 英凡提诺就可以启动什麽委员会 改判延缓一年执行... ※ 引述《zxc906383 (无无)》之铭言： : https://reurl.cc/yW1Ok6 : Belgium has appealed against FIFA’s decision to suspend the one-game ban handed : to Folarin Balogun, less than 24 hours out from the team’s World Cup round-of- : 16 game against the United States. : 比利时已对FIFA的决定提出上诉，该决定原本是对Folarin Balogun做出的一场禁赛处分， : 但距离对阵美国队的世界盃16强比赛不到24小时，这项禁赛却被暂时撤销 : In a statement — released Monday, after The Athletic exclusively revealed that : Belgium had the right to appeal the decision — the Royal Belgian Football Assoc : iation (RBFA) confirmed it had “no alternative but to challenge (Balogun’s) el : igibility for the upcoming match”. : 在周一发布的声明中（此前《The Athletic》独家披露比利时有权上诉），比利时足协表示 : ，他们「别无选择，只能挑战（Balogun）在即将到来比赛中的出场资格」 : The RBFA said it had learned of the change in Balogun’s circumstances through m : edia reports and written to FIFA to request a full explanation of “the process : ” and “applicable regulations”. : 比利时足协表示，他们是透过媒体报导才得知Folarin Balogun情况的变动，并已致函FIFA : ，要求完整说明「程序」与「适用规则」 : “As its only response, FIFA sent a letter to the RBFA stating that it considere : d this correspondence to constitute an appeal that a judge had been appointed, : and that the RBFA had only a few hours to complete that appeal. No information w : hatsoever was provided by FIFA,” the RBFA statement continued. : RBFA声明续称：「FIFA唯一的回应，是来信表示将此视为上诉，并已指派法官，且RBFA仅剩 : 数小时完成上诉，但FIFA未提供任何资讯」 : “For an appeal to be admissible, FIFA’s own regulations state that the reasone : d decision must first have been communicated to the appellant. While the RBFA wa : s merely seeking legitimate explanations, FIFA itself created an appeal and imme : diately ensured that it would be declared inadmissible.” : 「依FIFA规定，上诉成立前必须先向申诉方提供具理由的决定，但RBFA只是要求合理解释， : FIFA却自行将其视为上诉，并使其立即可能被判定不成立」 : “All of this occurred while FIFA simultaneously refused to respond to the RBFA : ’s legitimate requests … To be clear, as of this moment, the RBFA has still no : t received any decision or any explanation from FIFA regarding this matter. It t : herefore has no alternative but to challenge the player’s eligibility for the u : pcoming match.” : 「在这一切发生同时，FIFA也拒绝回应RBFA的合理请求……截至目前，RBFA仍未收到任何决 : 定或解释，因此别无选择，只能挑战该球员的出赛资格」 : Sources briefed on the matter, speaking anonymously to protect relationships, ha : ve now told The Athletic that both U.S. Soccer and the Belgian federation were a : sked to make submissions by 5am PST on Monday morning, which has exasperated the : Belgians who have not received the decision by FIFA to review, as it is not mad : e public. : 知情人士匿名向《The Athletic》表示，美国足球协会与比利时足协都被要求在周一清晨5 : 点（太平洋时间）前提交文件，但比利时方面尚未收到FIFA的公开审查决定，对此感到相当 : 不满 : A member of the FIFA appeals committee — who does not represent a federation in : either UEFA or CONCACAF — has been selected to hear the case. : 一名FIFA Appeals Committee成员已被指定审理此案，且该成员不代表UEFA或CONCACAF任何 : 协会，以避免利益冲突 : Submissions must now be made by Monday morning, with a ruling possible before th : e game, but Belgium have not been provided with any guarantees by FIFA that this : will be the case. : 相关文件必须在周一上午前提交，裁决有可能在比赛前出炉，但FIFA并未向比利时保证一定 : 会在赛前完成判决 : It would be extraordinary at this stage if FIFA were to change their position fo : r a second time, with Balogun under a one game ban between Wednesday night until : Sunday morning, until FIFA suddenly suspended the one-match ban. It is unclear : whether the appeal is merely procedural or if it has a genuine chance of moving : the goalposts once more ahead of a huge knockout game at a World Cup. : 在此阶段若FIFA再次改变立场将极不寻常，Folarin Balogun原本自周三晚至周日早晨处於 : 禁赛状态，但FIFA突然暂停禁赛，目前仍不清楚这次上诉只是程序性，还是可能再次改变规 : 则，影响世界盃淘汰赛 : The Athletic had already reported that Belgium has requested the full rationale : behind the decision to lift Balogun’s suspension, as well as the report from FI : FA’s refereeing body. FIFA’s disciplinary committee can decide against sharing : its rationale. : 《The Athletic》先前报导，比利时要求FIFA提供解除禁赛的完整理由与裁判委员会报告， : 但FIFA纪律委员会可以选择不公开理由 : The RBFA also alleged that FIFA “deliberately removed the section concerning th : e automatic suspension of players from its (pre-match) presentation” and said i : t had “questioned FIFA, both orally and in writing, about the reasons for this : change, yet once again received no response”. : RBFA还指控FIFA「刻意从赛前简报中移除了关於球员自动停赛的部分」，并表示已口头与书 : 面询问原因，但再次没有得到回应 : Belgium’s statement concluded: “Regardless of the sporting outcome of this mat : ch, the RBFA is deeply concerned by the course of events and will continue to fi : ght in the coming hours, days and months in defence of the fundamental principle : s of ethics, fair competition, and the interests of football as a whole.” : 比利时声明最後表示：「无论比赛结果如何，RBFA对此事件的发展深感忧虑，并将在接下来 : 的数小时、数天与数月持续为足球的伦理、公平竞争与整体利益而战」 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 23.19.230.221 (美国) ※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/WorldCup/M.1783358639.A.2BC.html