作者mistylake (那时 所谓的永远...)
看板WesternMusic
标题[新闻] BB: 99-cent的BTW对Gaga唱片公司的伤害
时间Wed Jun 15 10:55:06 2011
※ [本文转录自 LadyGaga 看板 #1D-1vJty ]
Billboard的另外一篇关於Amazon 99-cent销售的文章
探讨Amazon的廉价促销对Gaga所属唱片公司所带来的伤害
论点:
唱片公司铺货高达210万张
如果唱片公司提前得知Amazon的低价促销的话 他们一定会降低铺货量
一般而言 铺货量多为首周实体唱片预估销售数字的两倍之内
在Gaga这个例子则是达到了4.7比1
由於太多销售量都被Amazon抢去 实体CD销量降低
零售商店为了要库存管理及提高现金 将会有大量退货的现象
各家唱片公司对於Amazon的做法都感到不满
Amazon主管
"Gaga专辑的价值当然超过99 cents, 所以当它被以99 cents的价格促销的时候
大家才会疯狂抢购-------如果不是这样, 根本不会有人在意的...."
Let's get one thing straight. The Lady Gaga 99 cent sale for 'Born This Way'
was a great thing for the artist, and for Amazon. On a short-term basis, you
could even make the case that it was great for the industry.
The 99 cent sale was big mainstream-media news, and that certainly benefited
everyone, including other retailers. The album sold 1.1 million
units--662,000 digital, 449,000 physical--in its debut week ending May 29,
according to Nielsen SoundScan.
The story lasted all week in the press. It worked the same way that Target
and Best Buy circulars work: driving traffic to everyone's stores, not just
those two big-box chains, or, in this case, Amazon's site. I'd argue that the
glitch arising when Amazon's overwhelmed servers couldn't satisfy customer
demand was a good thing, too, since it made the sale even bigger news. Given
Amazon's impeccable service reputation, that blip won't hurt it long term.
For the cost of $3.3 million-that is, $8.40 wholesale minus 99 cents retail
times 443,000 scans during the two-day sale-Amazon put itself on the map as a
digital music merchant, in a way that the same amount of money spent on
traditional advertising could never have bought.
But whether the sale helps Interscope remains to be seen. First, Interscope
and Universal Music Group Distribution (UMGD) shipped 2.1 million album units
before street date. If they knew in advance of Amazon's sale, you can bet
they would've cut back on the initial CD allotment.
As is, Interscope has an inventory liability, with some merchants saying they
need to return product. And if some of that talk comes from a few retail
accounts being miffed over the Amazon deal, some is also due to simple math.
The CD album sold 449,000 units of the 2.1 million shipped, for a 21.4
percent sell-through. Second-week sales are at 174,000 units (136,000 CDs),
or 27.8 percent sell-through.
A decade ago, major-label shipment formulas called for shipping three units
for everyone expected to be scanned in the first week. Nowadays, with a more
efficient inventory replenishment, the ratio has dipped under 2-to-1.
But in Lady Gaga's case, UMGD shipped 4.7 units for each first-week scan.
Even another big hit single, which would ensure a sooner sell-through of all
2.1 million units, won't stop merchants now from returning the album to
improve their cash position. Interscope is probably looking at a few hundred
thousand returns, depending on whether the label comes up with a sweetener to
keep inventory in stores.
Competing labels and distributors may be even angrier than merchants about
the sale. "This was a really bad move," the head of an independent
distributor says. "Ninety-nine cents is almost free."
"If this happened in the 1990s, there would have been a big hue and cry from
retail, even bigger than what it was this time," the head of sales at a major
label says.
But these are different times. And in the digital world, "there are going to
be times when music is the toy in the Happy Meal," a UMG executive says.
Another Universal exec adds, "If Amazon tries to turn 99 cent superstar
albums into a regular thing, I would be outraged."
Yet, some suggest that a few label marketers themselves may now start pushing
such a pricing strategy to break an artist, or get an album into the No. 1
spot. Others say that, in the '90s, that inevitably would've followed-but not
in today's market, when profit trumps chart success.
For all the talk about how the industry has evolved, though, former
distribution executive Jim Caparro says, "It is shocking how consistent the
industry is with the past. Today, it is almost parallel to how traditional
music retail acted back then, with big accounts looking to steal market share
by pricing."
But one executive familiar with Amazon's thinking says the Gaga pricing won't
hurt the industry.
"Of course 'Born This Way' is worth more than 99 cents," the executive says.
"That's why it created such retail excitement and buzz, when it was offered
for 99 cents ... If it wasn't actually worth more, no one would have cared."
--
所谓真相
其实都只是表相...
http://friend.top1069.com/user/mistylake
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 69.140.81.243
1F:→ mistylake:我觉得文章中没有提到因为99 cent所带来的销售量增加 06/15 10:55
※ 编辑: mistylake 来自: 69.140.81.243 (06/15 10:57)
2F:推 ronytw:我比较好奇文中提到的总数位销量662,000,Amazon占了多少 06/15 13:24
3F:推 loveyourself:唱片公司舖210万张是代表原本他们就预估不算阿马爽 06/15 14:16
4F:→ loveyourself:促销也能破百万张?似乎有点高估.. 06/15 14:17
5F:→ mistylake:可能觉得她上张专辑卖很好 期待度很高吧... 06/15 18:12
6F:推 IAmFreeAndU:若用首天预测的80万来计算 210万的铺货量是接近2:1的 06/15 18:13
7F:→ IAmFreeAndU:而原PO文中的4.7:1 是果 不是因吧?撰文者有点倒果为因 06/15 18:14
8F:→ IAmFreeAndU:能推敲的只有一点 本来要买15.99的人流到0.99的还不少 06/15 18:16
9F:推 Lovemei:Amazon约占44万张~ 06/15 18:45
10F:→ mistylake:恩 撰文者的意思是 铺货铺这麽多是因为没有预期Amazon会 06/15 19:10
11F:→ mistylake:贱价出售 如果唱片公司早知道的话就不会铺货铺到4.7:1 06/15 19:11
12F:→ mistylake:这种离谱的比例 06/15 19:11
13F:推 IAmFreeAndU:我觉得文中第四段颇玩味的 XDD 哈哈 XDD 06/15 19:23
14F:→ kissahping:之前阴谋论成那样,这篇新闻一出来现在显得格外愚蠢。 06/15 22:13
15F:推 IAmFreeAndU:请问楼上看的懂吗? 我想你所谓的阴谋论指的是我的文章 06/15 22:18
16F:→ IAmFreeAndU:跟我所言的"阴谋论"之临时 并无矛盾之处耶... 06/15 22:19
17F:→ kissahping:没有自知之明当然不产生矛盾。但也不奇怪,要是有自知 06/15 22:20
18F:→ kissahping:之明,也不会抓着没有根据的论点一直回文了。 06/15 22:21
19F:→ kissahping:一路看下来,无论产业新闻或娱乐新闻都在打阴谋论者的 06/15 22:22
20F:→ IAmFreeAndU:那请你说说你的高见吧? :) 06/15 22:22
21F:→ kissahping:脸,可笑非常。 06/15 22:22
22F:→ HAKUNA0502:又开始了...唉 06/15 22:23
23F:→ kissahping:我的高见和billloung很类似,但我想你就是看不懂啊。XD 06/15 22:23
24F:→ kissahping:因为这一切一定都是唱片公司和Amazon合力搞出来的,绝 06/15 22:24
25F:→ kissahping:对不是Amazon破坏行情的行销手法喔~一切都是唱片公司 06/15 22:24
26F:→ kissahping:的阴谋。→结果没几天就被BB打脸。XDDD 06/15 22:25
27F:→ kissahping:以台湾人的性格,无法了解这种行销手法也是自然。:) 06/15 22:26
28F:→ IAmFreeAndU:你心平气和後去翻翻旧文吧 没人这样搞行销的 :) 06/15 22:28
29F:→ IAmFreeAndU:本文第四段都说 你还在坚持什麽? 06/15 22:29
30F:→ IAmFreeAndU:你数日前的讽刺推文 我就当眼不见为净了 06/15 22:29
31F:→ kissahping:当然,我相信台湾人是绝对不会懂这种行销手法。:) 06/15 22:30
32F:→ IAmFreeAndU:懂不懂是你的事 但你今天的酸 让人感到无奈啊 哈哈 06/15 22:30
33F:→ kissahping:你也不用假装看不见,因为我是真心这样看你。 06/15 22:31
34F:→ IAmFreeAndU:连商业互利原则都不理解的论点 要成立 很难说服啊... 06/15 22:32
35F:→ kissahping:第四段只说了传统广告不会花这样的钱,但这次很显然并 06/15 22:32
36F:→ kissahping:不是传统广告...XDDD 06/15 22:32
37F:→ IAmFreeAndU:都说了 没人这样搞 你要认为这是"非传统"也行啦... 06/15 22:35
38F:推 kissahping:夏虫不可语冰,真是浪费时间。不过这些新闻陆续出来, 06/15 22:37
39F:→ kissahping:对比前後态度,真是格外讽刺。XD 06/15 22:37
40F:→ IAmFreeAndU:彼此 彼此 :) 06/15 22:42
41F:→ c98518:IAmFreeAndU真的不腻喔?到现在还在吵这个...=___=" 06/17 10:19