无意间发现的另一个经营WG／WT／AW等游戏的网站 这份Q&A在Status Report上也有，但是这里的提问脉络比较清楚 这次翻翻看这个，大家可以比较看看有没有不同 Translated by Alex. Thanks! Q: What can you tell us about the M4/FL10 and Waffentrager Leopard? Is it possible to introduce them in to the game? A: The M4/FL10 is being looked at as a potential candidate to be introduced, there are no problems with the machine, but the main question is where do we put it? There is no certainty about an Arabian crew. Regarding the Waffentrager Leopard, this machine never existed. There was a 105mm SPG project based on it and work got to a full size wooden mock up, but our feelings towards premium artillery aren’t enthusiastic. There are also real projects that reached the prototyping stages. Q：说说看搭载FL-10（AMX-13炮塔）的M4还有WT-Leopard的消息，他们有可能加入游 戏中吗？ A：前者有作为潜在候选车推出的机会，车辆本身没有问题，但要把它放在哪才是问 题，而目前没有推出阿拉伯组员的可能。而再看WT-Leo，这台车根本不存在，是有 一个搭载105mm的自走炮计画，并进展到1:1木制模型的阶段。但我们并不想推出金币 SPG，其他可能候选则也还有一些已经有原型车阶段的计画。 M4/FL-10：http://wot-news.com/uploads/img/112015/pa_1.jpg Q: Is there a possibility of a super-heavy tank branch for the Soviets, like the Japanese? Like the T-39 or T-100Z? A: A super-heavy branch is unlikely, but a heavy branch has some possibilities. Q：苏联还有机会向日本线一样推出超重坦线吗？把T-39或T-100Z搞出来之类的？ A：超重坦线没甚麽指望，但一般重坦线还有可能性。 Q: Did the T-34-85 ever carry a 100mm gun historically? A: Yes, in 1945 they managed to fit a 100mm gun in the T-34-85 turret, but the design struggled. Q：T-34/85在史实上有搭载过100mm炮吗？ A：有，1945年曾将100炮弄到T-34/85的炮塔，但设计案最後废弃了。 Q: How many hulls did the T-44 have, and which was the most armoured? A: Minimum 3. The hull that was put in to serial production was the most protected. Q：T-44到底有几个车体设计？哪一个装甲最好？ A：最少有三个，最後投入量产的就是装甲最好的。 Q: Were there any tank destroyers based on the T-28 chassis? A: No, by the end of the ’30s the T-28 was obsolete. Q：有任何TD是基於T-28设计的吗？ A：都没有，30年代末期T-28就已经过时了。 Q: Were there any projects on the KV chassis other than the KV-7 and SU-152? A: My favourite, the U-19 armed with the 203mm B-4. Otherwise I wrote a whole book about them. Q：那麽基於KV底盘，除了KV-7以及SU-152的TD呢？ A：不得不提我的最爱：U-19，搭载了B-4 203炮的玩意儿，我有写一本关於他们谱系 的书。（译更正：U-19并非wiki上所述的是S-51） U-19：http://wot-news.com/uploads/img/112015/pa_3a.jpg Q: Did any research projects exist that used the M-34 aircraft engine? A: T-100 and SMK. Q：有任何研究计画使用到M-34航空引擎的吗？ A：T-100跟SMK。 T-100图：http://wot-news.com/uploads/img/112015/pa_4a.jpg SMK图：http://wot-news.com/uploads/img/112015/pa_4b.jpg Q: Does the in-game IS-6 have a historical top speed? A: This question goes to the balance department! Q：游戏中IS-6的速度是符合史实的吗？ A：这个问题你得问平衡部门！ Q: What do you think about an E-25 with a 88mm gun? A: The hamster will burst. (In other words, fake/not possible) Q：E-25搭载一门88炮的话你怎麽看？ A：不可能的。（译：前面不会翻...留着原文大家意会就好） Q: Where did the Grille 15 come from, didn’t the schematics show us something resembling a GW Panther? A: In reality, the name GW Panther is provisional, some of the variants on that chassis were named like the Grille 15. The GW Tiger was called Grille 17. Q：Grille 15这台车怎麽来的？之前没有像是GWP一样的相关的示意图释出啊？ A：讲真的，GW豹是暂时名称，该衍生型相关的命名是叫做Grille 15，而GW虎则是称 作Grille 17。 Q: Are there any machines left to add new MT branches to existing nations? A: There are some possibilities but not Soviet. Q：有任何可能的中坦线能够加到现存的国家线里吗？ A：有一些可能性但苏联没有。 Q: Are there any machines left to add new LT branches to existing nations? A: There are also some possibilities but it’s too early to tell. Q：（承上）那麽轻坦呢？ A：也有一些可能但现在要谈还太早。 Q: In Company of Heros 2, the ISU-152 has concrete-piercing rounds. In WoT they’re called armour-piercing, or does it have both types of rounds? A: A general greeting to the CoH consultants, that’s all I can say. The armour-piercing rounds for the ML-20S were developed in 1943 and that’s when they went in to service. Q：在COH2中，ISU-152配了「碉堡克星」弹药，在WOT中他被称为穿甲弹，还是说这 是两种不同的弹药？ A：帮我向COH的顾问问好，就这样。ML-20S主炮的穿甲弹是在1943年开发并在同年发 配使用。 Q: What are your comments on the fact that, in-game, the SP. IC has a mass of 9+ton, but IRL, it has a mass of less than 7ton? A: …And again the question goes to the balance department! Q：你对於SPIC在游戏中重逾九吨，但在现实中他竟少於七吨这件事情有什麽要说的？ A：...老话一句，问平衡部门去。 Q: What is the most unusual super-heavy tank project you’ve seen? What country did it come from, and do we need such machine in the game? A: In Kazakhstan there was a proposal for a 14,000 ton vibro-tank (it moved using vibration), made of steel reinforced concrete. Are you sure you need this in Randoms? Q：有甚麽超重坦计画是你们看过最特别的？从哪来的？在游戏中推出可能吗？ A：在哈萨克有一个14,000吨的谐振运动型车辆计画，由钢筋混凝土构成，你确定你想 要在随机战斗中看到这玩意儿...？ （译：图在下方留言区） Q: Why does the T-34s ZiS-2 have 112mm of penetration, measured at 90 degrees, but the Pz.Kpfw. IIIs KwK39/L60 have 67mm of penetration, measured at 30 degrees? Because at 90 degrees and 100 meters the KwK39 L/60 should have 90-98mm of penetration. What are the reasons for using penetration measurements taken at different angles? A: Again, the question goes to the balance department. Q：为什麽T-34家族的ZiS-2（57mm）在90度下有112mm穿深，但三号的KwK 39（5cm） 在30度下却是67mm，换算下来90度、100公尺距离下的KwK 39应该有90-98mm的穿深， 所以使用不同角度出来的穿深数据来套用的理由是？ A：还是一样，去问平衡部门。 Q: What can you say about the replacement of the FV215b? How is the Super Conqueror better or worse than the Chieftain? A: For example, the Chieftain isn’t classified as a heavy tank. Q：对於FV215b取代案你的看法是？超级征服者跟酋长比起来孰好孰烂？ A：这样说，酋长的分类并不是重坦喔！（译：意思是不能比啦。） Q: Is there enough tanks for an alternative MT branch for the Americans? The Patton III is a great tank but a bit of a barn. Is there anything smaller? A: There aren’t enough tanks. Q：美国中坦线有足够的替代车吗？M48巴顿是不错啦但有点太肥，有其他更小台的吗？ A：车辆不足，谢谢指教。 Q: Is the T-84 concept by P.P. Vasilyev a fake or were there schematics? In my opinion it seems like it would fit as a replacement for the Obj. 430 since the concept continues the branch (rear turret MT). A: I don’t think it will pull up to a tier 10. What for anyway? Q：T-84 Concept是假的还是有图纸？在我看来她好像能够成为Object.430的替代车， 而且能够延续这条线的特色（炮塔後置）。 A：我不认为他能够被拉到十阶去，而且为什麽要这麽做呢？ T-84 1949图：http://wot-news.com/uploads/img/112015/pa_6.jpg Q: Is the game model of the T110E5 historical? Because on the schematics the front plates were flat and highly angled, but in-game they are rounded, and there was a different gun mantlet. A: What’s historical about paper drawings and a mock up? To be honest, I wouldn’t want to get in to a discussion about the historicity of the whole concept. Q：游戏中的T110E5模型符合史实吗？在图纸上前装甲看起来很平而且角度很大，然而 游戏中它比较圆，而且炮盾也长的不一样。 A：你对图纸跟模型要求什麽史实？我实在不想要开启有关这个关於「史实与否」的话 题。 Q: In your livejournal you mentioned that the T110 project had near 10 variants, we only have 3 in-game. Is the introduction of the rest a reality, as alternatives or separate branches from tier 8? A: There’s no sense in doing that. Q：在你的日志中曾提到T110计画有将近10种衍生型，游戏中只有三种，其他衍生型有 可能成为若干条从T8接续的线吗？ A：没必要。 Q: You’ve talked before about replacing the T28 at tier 8, because technically the tier 8 and 9 are the same machine. What projects are there to replace it, since the T28 HTC is already in the game? A: We’ve found and counted up 6 variants of the T28/T95. Q：你曾经提过有关T28的取代可能，因为T8跟T9本质上是同台车，但T28 HTC已经在游 戏里了，那麽会是用甚麽计画去取代它呢？ A：我们已经找到超过6个T28/T95的衍生型。 Q: The British have development concepts for 3 tank series, FV300 (light), FV200 (medium-heavy) and FV100 (super-heavy). What is known about 300 and 100 series projects? We only have one 300 series project (an arty) and no 100 series projects. A: We are thinking about 300 series. Nothing about 100s at the moment. Q：英国发展了大约三个系列的车辆概念：FV300轻坦计画、FV200中重坦计画与FV100 超重坦计画，那麽有关FV300跟FV100的计画是什麽？我们目前只有一台300计画而没有 任何100计画的车。 A：我们有在考虑300计画，100计画目前则无。 Q: What is your personal opinion about the T-14 Armata? A: If it going into serial production then we will have something to talk about, nothing to talk about for now. And yeah, Norinco knows the sense in crew hatches, I saw myself in Paris. Q：你个人对T-14阿玛塔有什麽评论？ A：如果他进入量产阶段那就有比较多可以讨论的，现在则没办法说什麽。而肯定的是 中国北方工业知道成员舱的秘密，而我自己在巴黎有看到。 Q: There have been mentions of mounting a BL-10 in an IS-7, is this truth or a fake concept? A: Not BL-10 152mm but BL-13 122mm, and also there was an Obj. 705A with a M51 152mm gun. Q：曾经有多个消息提到IS-7装配BL-10，这个说法是真的还假的？ A：是BL-13而非BL-10，同时也还有个Object.705A计画装的是M51 152mm主炮。 IS-7装BL-13图：http://wot-news.com/uploads/img/112015/pa_7.jpg 似乎可理解成IS-7後置炮塔型 M51 152mm在Obj.705A上的图：http://wot-news.com/uploads/img/112015/pa_7a.jpg Q: Were there real plans to mount a 10.5cm Pak L/52 on the JagdPanther? A: That was a balance decision. Q：确实有猎豹上装105mm L/52的计画吗？ A：这是为了平衡的考量。 Q: Which classes of tanks could we expect, apart from MTs, in the Czechoslovakian tree? A: Apart from HTs, the other classes fill up adequately. Q：除了中坦外，我们还可以期待有哪些车辆加入捷克斯洛伐克线？ A：除了重坦之外的都能够完整加入。 Q: Is it legal to give the 150mm gun of the Grille 15 an accuracy of 0.268? It works out to the caliber of the round is 1.5 times smaller than the spread of the weapon, and how was such a powerful and heavy gun stabilised? A: You definitely want to talk about realism in a game about tanks? Q：给Grille 15一只准度0.268的15公分炮，这还有王法嘛！这对口径比括圈小1.5倍 的炮是行得通啦，但这种又重又有威力的炮还是这麽稳？ A：你想在游戏中跟我讨论真实对吧？ Q: Are there any TDs or SPGs on the basis of the T-54/T-55 other than the SU-122-54 (D-49 gun) or SU-122-54 (M-62 gun planned)? A: Personally, I haven’t seen any. Q：除了SU-122-54的两种计画外，有任何TD或SPG是基於T-54/T-55开发的吗？ A：个人经验来说，我还没看过其他的。 Q: In-game there is the SU-122-44 with a 122mm D-25, were there any plans to mount a D-10T? A: Work didn’t go past a concept, and no discussions about other guns. Q：游戏中我们有一台122mm D-25炮的SU-122-44，有计画推出搭载100mm D-10T的版本 吗？ A：过去没有提到这个概念，也没有关於其他主炮的讨论。 Q: Are you consulted about historical battles, opreations, etc? A: They ask – I consult. Q：你有谘询过其他有关历史战斗、营运等情况吗？ A：他们提问，我做顾问。 Q: The SU-100 had a variant that mounted a D-25T, and it seems like this system went well during testing – how come this machine was refused? A: Because it didn’t actually go that well. Q：SU-100有过个衍生型配122主炮，而且测试看起来也不错，但为什麽这计画後来废 弃了？ A：因为实际上它运作的没那麽好。 Q: Yuri, were there any Waffentrager projects on the Tiger chassis, I or II? A: Grille 17. Q：Yuri有任何其他以虎式底盘做的WT计画吗？用虎一还虎二做的？ A：Grille 17就是了。 Q: How many actual concepts were spawned from the American T95 medium tank chassis? A: I honestly haven’t counted. For those that want to count I recommend reading works by Richard Hunnicutt. Q：有多少发想与概念是基於美国T95中坦底盘衍生出来的？ A：我其实没有算过，对那些想要算的人我推荐你们去读Hunnicutt的书。 Q: How do you feel about the T-34-100 being in the Czech tree? A: What’s the problem? It’s a completely different machine compared to the one developed here. Q：你对於T-34-100放在捷克线的看法是？ A：有问题吗？那台车跟原本的（苏联的）相比完全不同。 Q: How temperamental was the T-64 engine? A: There are very opposing views on this topic. （译：问T-64引擎的材质，不重要） Q: Why did the USSR reject the Obj. 416? Was it too difficult to manufacture or there are other causes? A: It’s really a TD, but Morozov made a kind of tank, it’s strange and something simpler was required. Q：为什麽Object.416被苏联取消了？是因为太难制造还是有其他因素？ A：它就是台TD，但Morozov制造局制作太多种车，416太怪异而且需要其他更简单的 车种。 Q: In terms of general characteristics, what is better – T-10M or IS-7? A: Shashmurin thought the T-10, as a simplified realisation of the Obj. 260. Q：以数据上来看，T-10M跟IS-7哪台比较好？ A：Shashmurin认为T-10作为Object.260概念的简化，它比较好。 Q: Did the GW E100 exist in reality? Did it have any other guns in project stages? Can WG change the gun to something else? A: The only project on the E-100 chassis was an assault SPG. I hope the answer to the question is understood. Q：GW E-100在现实中存在吗？在这个计画层级上还有其他主炮可能吗？WG有办法把 它的炮换成其他的吗？ A：基於E-100底盘所开发的唯一计画是台突击自走炮，我希望这个解答不难懂。 Q: What projects do you know of on the T-100 chassis? A: T-100H – The first SPG project based on the T-100. T-100U – SPG, constructed in metal. T-100Z – T-100 with a new turret and 152mm field gun M-10. The turret was made and installed in a bunker. T-103 – Coastal defence tank with 130mm gun. Q：你知道有什麽其他关於T-100底盘的计画吗？ A：T-100H，第一个基於T-100底盘的自走炮；T-100U，钢铁制自走炮；T-100Z，搭载 新式炮塔与一门152mm M-10榴炮，炮塔之前设计装在碉堡上；T-103，搭载130mm炮的 海岸巡防车。 T-103图：http://wot-news.com/uploads/img/112015/pa_8.jpg Q: Last time there was a question about a 120mm gun on the Lorraine 40t – they must of been talking about this (pic: imagine Foch on Lorraine chassis) can you tell us about it? A: There is not much to tell here. They built it, tested it, didn’t like it. Potentially there’s no issues with making this tank, we know the base. The question is about protection, this isn’t a Foch. Q：上次有一个关於洛琳40T搭载120mm炮的问题，他们必须被提及（译：诸位可以想 像一下Foch装在洛琳底盘上的样子），你可以谈谈吗？ A：没甚麽好说的，他们做好它、测试它，但不喜欢它，可能在制造上没问题，但防 护力不行，毕竟这不是台Foch。（译：正面防护有问题之类） Lorraine 40T w/ 120mm图：http://wot-news.com/uploads/img/112015/pa_9.jpg Q: What TDs and SPGs are there based on the T-62? A: T-62 is a TD, technically a simplified version of the IT-1. At the beginning, “Object 166” was being developed as a new medium tank, with plans to develop/test it between 1959-1960 and put in to serial production in 1961. But in February of 1959 the topic changed to “… tank destroyer with a new, powerful, smooth-bore gun, with dual plane stabilisation, using the new ‘Molot’ and ‘Rapira’ guns”. There were plans to build 50 “Object 166” TDs. Q：有任何基於T-62底盘衍生的TD或SPG吗？ A：T-62其实是台TD，技术上是简化版本的IT-1（译：苏联开发的飞弹战车）。刚开 始Object.166被发展为一种新的中坦，计画在1959年到1960年间投入开发与测试， 并於1961年投入量产。但在1959年二月计画变更为「...搭载新型、威力更强的滑膛 炮，辅以水平/垂直稳定器，并装上Rapira 100mm滑膛炮与Molot枪械。曾经计画建造 50台的Object.166 TD。 这篇落落长...有很多东西我也不是很懂，有错麻烦版友不吝指正。 原文网址：http://thearmoredpatrol.com/2015/11/02/yuri-pasholok-qa-6/ --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 114.36.75.126 ※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/Wargaming/M.1446488912.A.64E.html http://wot-news.com/uploads/img/112015/pa_5c.jpg 补一下图片，昨天还没贴上去的样子 看起来一点也不像战车阿... ※ 编辑: tai33ru (140.114.112.30), 11/03/2015 11:50:19