作者WillieHuang (Willie)
看板WoT
标题[情报] 5/26 Q&A
时间Wed May 28 03:25:55 2014
- Storm on quoting Discovery Channel (Great Tank Battles show) as a
historical source: “Discovery is even more laughable than Wikipedia. My
source are our historical consultants.” (SS: the question was, whether there
were Tigers in Ardennes – there were a few, they didn’t fight though)
有人引用探索频道(Great Tank Battles 节目),Storm:「它比维基百科更可笑。我的
资料来源是我们的历史顾问。」
- for now, developers aren’t considering removing the rule where both sides
have to have the same amount of arty (and scouts) (SS: this rule is not
absolute, I think there is +/-1 tolerance)
不打算移除让两边火炮(和侦查车)数量一致的规则(SS: 有正负一的容忍值)
- Storm states that when it comes to historicity of guns in World of Tanks –
made up tanks (WT E-100) can have any gun that fits, historical tanks can
only have guns they had in real life
Storm 表示,当要 WoT 要求史实时,架空车可用任何一门合用的炮,而实际的车就只能装
史实炮。
- Storm regarding the assault mode: “What is there to comment? It’s a
normal mode. I play it from the beginning without switching it off.”
Storm 不觉得突击模式有什麽问题。(意译)
- Storm, explaining why assault and encounter modes don’t have their own
specialized maps and responding to a player who claims they are bland:
“Because we don’t consider it rational to make maps for those mods only.
You personally decide the level of blandness of a mode? Are there any normal
criteria that determine “blandness”? Assault and Encounter mode are
finished and polished. Historical battles are in the state of finding the
correct solution.”
不认为突击/遭遇模式应该有专属地图。(略译)
- Storm reacting on the “28 bots in one game” video: “You’d have to find
out what is shown in there in general and how it happened. Personally, I don’
t have time to do this on Sunday. Sorry.”
关於1场28只BOT的影片,Storm 表示这不干他的事。(意译)
- according to Storm, the TD share in battles has long since stopped growing
and now is within normal frame. WG checks every month.
据 Storm 说法,战场上 TD 所占的比重已经很久没成长了,目前还在合理范围。WG 每个
月都检查。
- too many TD’s in battles? “Statistics do not confirm that” and “We do
not observe the dominance of TD’s”
TD 太多?「数据无法证实。」「并未看到大TD时代出现。」
- long map loading? “We are investigate this issue”
地图读取花很多时间?「我们正在研究。」
- Storm states that the IS-7 buff planned was a hoax started by Jove (Russian
streamer), there will be no buff (SS: to my eternal shame, I jumped on this
too – basically, he – or someone else – photoshopped a fake screenshot of
“Storm’s post”)
Storm 表示IS-7 buff 计画是一个由 Jove(俄国玩家)所发起的骗局,buff 不会发生。
- Storm doesn’t know whether the A45/FV201 will be a tier 7 or 8 and when
will it come
Storm 也不清楚 A45/FV201 会是七或八阶车,以及何时出现。
- situations where you get the same map several times in a row are apparently
okay
连进同一张图好几场的状况是正常的。
http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/26/26-5-2014/
--
In church, they say to forgive!
Forgiveness is between them and God;
it's my job to arrange the meeting. 《 Man on Fire 》
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 125.231.19.201
※ 文章网址: http://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/WoT/M.1401218762.A.89C.html
1F:推 windycat :IS7~ 不升DPM至少升一点金弹穿深嘛:3 05/28 03:41
2F:推 Yijhen0525 :探索频道的节目本就有些不公正,十大战舰里没大和号 05/28 06:24
3F:→ Yijhen0525 :就算没战绩好歹还有帐面数据 05/28 06:25
4F:推 LeonBolton :Discovery的十大XX都有个"量产数量"的评测项目 05/28 07:24
5F:→ LeonBolton :大和级太耗资源 只生产两艘 GG 05/28 07:25
6F:→ korsg :IS-7 不期不待 不受伤害...这台太中庸了XDD 05/28 08:00
7F:推 ykes60513 :太好了 WG还是有点良心的 就算是亲儿子也不能太宠他 05/28 08:38
8F:→ hitlerx :IS-7不是亲儿子 是乾儿子 05/28 11:21
9F:推 fxp87117 :有IS7的话CW一定有上场机会 苦力永远不嫌多XD 05/28 11:33
10F:推 KusoPvt :IS-7炮实在太烂 05/28 16:45