作者WillieHuang (Willie)
看板WoT
标题[情报] 11/10 Q&A
时间Mon Nov 11 15:31:32 2013
Chieftain wrote an interesting post about gun characteristics. You might
wanna check it out!
Chieftain 写了篇文章讲炮的特性,有兴趣的话可以看看。
http://goo.gl/MeIKjQ
- ISU-130 (ISU with 130mm gun) won’t be implemented for now
ISU-130 目前不会出现。
- T-35 with additional spaced armor and 122/130/152/180mm guns is complete
garbage according to SerB
据 SerB 表示,USSR T-35 外挂间隙装甲或 122/130/152/180mm 大口径炮的谣言根本是
是胡扯。
[更正]
- T-100 might appear in the game (but not with KV-2 turret)
USSR T-100 可能会在游戏中出现(但是不会装KV-2的炮塔)。
- Soviet Panzer IV with 57mm ZIS gun has zero chance of appearing in game, no
info on other two Soviet rearm projects (Panther with 85mm gun, Tiger with
100mm D-10T, yes – that plan existed)
USSR 掳获四号中坦搭配 57mm ZIS 神针的组合不可能出现在游戏中,但没有另两个改
装计画的消息(掳获豹式搭85炮和掳获虎式搭100mm D-10T——是的,真的有这计画)。
- project variant of ISU-122 with 150mm frontal armor won’t appear as an
optional hull
前装甲加到 150mm 的 ISU-122 改款不会以可选车体的形式出现。
- shell velocity does not combine with the tank forward speed in the game
(SS: as in, if the tank moves forward at 1 m/s and the shell flies at 300
m/s, this shell won’t fly at 301 m/s)
游戏中炮弹速度不会和车速叠加。(不管你跑多快,打出去的炮弹速度都一样)
- the fact that T69 reloads its autoloader for 26s, T54E1 for 33s and T57 for
25s is due to the fact the T57 autoloading mechanism was more advanced
T69 重装炮弹匣要 26 秒,T54E1 要 33 秒而 T57 只要 25 秒的原因在於 T57 的自动
装弹机运作机制较先进。
- S-Tank will not be implemented into WoT, because the developers would have
to implement a mechanism especially for it. But if it was ever implemented,
it would be a TD.
瑞典的S战车不会在 WoT 中出现,因为须要特别为它打造新的游戏运作机制。假如要
加入,它会是台 TD。
- WG is not using “agile development process” method (SS: sorry, no idea
what that is, another option is “waterfall”), because for WG scale this
method is not viable, they use classic methods
WG 不使用「敏捷开发流程」作法(SS: 抱歉,不知道那是啥。),因为 WG 评估觉得
这玩意不可行。(译注:我也不知道那是啥…)
- WoWp loading window will possibly be added to WoT too
WoWp 登入画面可能会加到 WoT 中。
- Clanwars won’t be changed to 7/42 battle mode. It’s possible Clanwars
will have an amount of players increased – for commanders, there will be a
special command interface (a map) – “when it’s done it’s done”
公会战不会变成 7/42 战斗。打公会战的人数可能增加一些,会有新的指挥官界面
「WIDID」
- Japanese tanks that were produced but never fought might appear in
historical battles, but not straight away
日本线有一些虽然有被制造出来但没参与过战斗的车,他们可能出现在史实战斗中,但
不是马上。
[更正]
- Japanese tanks won’t have a special spall liner as their “national”
equipment (SS: in real life, the Japanese tanks were padded inside with
azbestos mesh to protect the crew from shrapnels and splinters)
不会为日系战车做特殊的衬里作为他们的国家特有装备。(SS: 现实中,日制战车内部
有一层石棉网用来防破片)
- it’s completely possible some of the regular Japanese tanks will have
improved Hara-type suspension
部份日系银币车配备改良「原」式悬吊是绝对可能的。
(译注:「Hara」来自日本战车之父「原 乙未生」的姓氏。指的应该是「シーソー式连动
悬架」,一种日本战车广泛应用的悬吊系统。例如九五式轻战。)
[更新]
- so far there is not enough info on Japanese top TD’s
目前日系顶阶 TD 的资料不足。
--
In church, they say to forgive!
Forgiveness is between them and God;
it's my job to arrange the meeting. 《 Man on Fire 》
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.45.232.226
1F:推 p4585424 :敏捷开发流程是软体开发方法的一种 11/11 15:36
3F:推 stonecoldii :靠 虎式配100mmd10t..听起来好弱..... 11/11 15:41
4F:推 donkilu :Agile是IBM提出的软体开发流程,对大公司来说有其必 11/11 15:59
5F:→ donkilu :要性,软体规模较小的话就没那麽需要。 11/11 16:00
6F:→ donkilu :目前看来WG的软体开发没啥问题,硬体server需要注意 11/11 16:01
7F:→ djmez :关键字:Tomio Hara 11/11 16:25
8F:推 tai33ru :感谢翻译 辛苦了~ 11/11 16:33
9F:推 Pegasus99 :弹速和车速叠加wwww 是能加多少啦! 11/11 16:54
※ 编辑: WillieHuang 来自: 220.136.228.70 (11/11 19:00)
10F:推 iamstudent :其实弹速与车速确实有影响,现实中炮弹飞超过一秒 11/11 20:33
11F:→ iamstudent :这一秒的时间足够战车跑超过一个车身 11/11 20:33
12F:→ iamstudent :计算一台横向移动的目标,就会影响前置量计算 11/11 20:34
13F:推 iamstudent :游戏中全速前进时往侧面射击,炮弹会落在发射时侧面 11/11 20:37
14F:→ iamstudent :实际上则是炮弹会有往前的速度,会击中侧面往前一点 11/11 20:38
15F:推 windycat :查了一下瑞典S战车...嗯不愧是瑞典真有设计感(? 11/11 22:02
16F:推 Pegasus99 :就算是游戏中飞最慢的HE 也有秒速近300m 11/11 22:02
17F:→ Pegasus99 :车速36km增加秒速10m 你跑72km也才+20 是有没有差 11/11 22:03
18F:→ Pegasus99 :何况这是HE 打AP弹时这差异根本微不足道 11/11 22:04
19F:→ batterykugua:居然不做S-Tank! 这精美的造型好想买 11/12 00:44
20F:推 kingsmill :感谢翻译!有一个误译:T-35那一条不是说T-35是废车 11/12 00:53
21F:→ kingsmill :而是说那些号称T-35有间隙装甲/各种大炮的言论都是 11/12 00:53
22F:→ kingsmill :garbage 11/12 00:54
23F:推 bill50514 :看T-35那车体能装76mm以上根本痴人说梦 光三炮就挤爆 11/12 01:10
感谢指正
※ 编辑: WillieHuang 来自: 114.45.235.161 (11/12 10:46)