今天一回家就准备上工... - according to SerB less than 30 percent of all players are in any clans SerB说只有不到三成的人加公会。 - there is some development of the visibility system being conducted. A player suggested the visibility system to encompass the view vectors of various crewmen (for example: the driver can see only forward), but Storm wrote such a thing (limited fields of view by crewmen) won't be implemented. SerB adds that he'd actually like to have that, but he's afraid that if they do that, there will be much confusion amongst the players regarding the visibility system 视野判定的功能正在进行研发。然後有个玩家建议：各个组员有各自的视 角（像是驾驶只能看见前方的视野），Storm 表示不会做，SerB补充说他 自己喜欢这点子，但是他怕这麽做会让玩家对这套机制陷入混乱。 - BT-5 will most likely appear as an alternative hull BT-5可能会发展成「可选车体」。 - rocket-carrying BT ("land torpedo") will not appear most likely as a gun option 带火箭的BT系列不会变成主炮替换选项。 - WG is not aware of any project of a TD/SPG, built on AMX-40 chassis WG不晓得任何在AMX-40的基础上发展的TD或SPG计画。 - new high tier 8 premium with high alpha (490+) planned? “If there ever is such a plan, I will tell” 计画加入单发伤害在490 以上的新八阶金币车？「如果真有这计画，我们 会说。」 - apparently, visibility checks consume about 2/3 of server resources 视野判定机制占了大概2/3的伺服器资源 - it's possible to see someone who is online on another server as offline in your friend list – during peak times (when the server switches to " performance mode"), a share of data that is normally shared between servers stops being shared and this is one of its effects 看见一个在另外一个伺服器分流的玩家显示为离线是可能的。因为在伺服 器尖峰期有一种现象会让一般情况下伺服器间互相分享的资料停止分享。 - an undisclosed Russian historical source states that at least one Tiger took place in the Hoth's assault to break the Stalingrad encirclement – it was allegedly destroyed by a 76mm Zis-3 gun. SerB states that it's most likely not true – it was probably a Panzer IV with armor screens or something like that, he also adds that such a confusion (calling all the enemy tanks Tigers) was not uncommon. (SS: that is true, for example several accounts of Slovak National Uprising from people who fought in it call pretty much every SPG a "Ferdinand" – if these accounts were true, there were more Ferdinands destroyed in the SNU than there were ever produced) 有个没有公开的苏联档案表示至少有一台虎式参与了突击史达林格勒的任 务，据称被76mm炮击毁了。但SerB认为那只是一台有侧裙的四号之类的坦 克，他个人也说这种混淆很常见。 （SS：没错，就像很多参与斯洛伐克民族起义的军人把每个他们所看到的 自走炮都认成Ferdi，但是这些数据超出Ferdi实际的制造数量太多） - there were Soviet turretted tank destroyer projects (for example a T-34 hull with an open turret and 53-K gun (45mm M1937)), but they won't be implemented for now 的确有一些有炮塔的苏联TD计画（开顶的T-34带45mm反坦克炮），但目前 我们不会做。 - Q: "Why do developers on one hand claim to fight sealclubbing and on the other hand they hand out tier 2/3 tanks en-masse?" A:"It's the lesser evil " (SS: take that as you will) Q： 为什麽你们的开发组边说要「抵制虐菜」，然後送一堆低阶坦克？ A： 「两害相权取其轻。」（SS：随你解读） - according to the developers it's good and normal that there are various gameplay styles throughout the tiers, as it allows the players to pick the gameplay that suits them: "Simply play the game that suits you. I for example prefer tier 8-10" 开发组表示，游戏中的每个车阶有不同的玩法相当好也相当正常，因为玩 家可以选择适合他的车阶：「就选适合你的玩嘛，像我就喜欢八到十阶。 」 - gun damage is basically arbitrary, it's a balance parameter (no point in asking “why does gun A have more alpha than gun B”) 炮的伤害基本上是任意设置的，这是个平衡的参数。（「为什麽A炮跟B炮 比有较高的单发伤害」这问题，没啥意义） - other balance parameters include tank hitpoints, module hitpoints and other characteristics, that don't exist in real life 另外，平衡参数也包含坦克的生命值、零件生命值以及其他特性，这些在 现实生活都不存在。 - equipment, increasing the amount of ammo carried will not be implemented, other ways of carrying more ammo won't be implemented for now either 目前不会加入增加弹药储量的装备，其他类似的机制同样不会做。 - SerB states that WG would give out the T7 Combat Car even if WoT didn't win, "as a reward for voting" SerB说就算WOT没有赢得金摇杆奖，T7 Combat Car还是会作为「感谢大家 投票支持」的谢礼。 原文网址：http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/28/28-10-2013/ -- --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 1.169.141.73 感谢指正orz 真是长知识了... 了解罗~已更正:) ※ 编辑: tai33ru 来自: 1.169.141.73 (10/29 21:40)