今日的QA~ For all those interested in modelling (real life modelling, like plastic tank kits), Revell is offering its products with World of Tanks codes inside. Pretty neat. SS说目前Revell这家模型厂商，有在他们的模型里头提供WOT的储值序号。 Also, the first FTR QA test was not successful: the questions were not replied for some reason, but the player was not banned, so no rules were broken. Will run a second test. 而上次测试的「FTR提问题到RU服的行动」似乎失败了，问题都没有被答覆 不过帮忙的发问者没有被BAN，所以SS还会再做第二次测试。 - there is no special MM for platoons 战车排不会有特殊分房机制。 - the D-83 gun is not planned for World of Tanks (SS: Soviet experimental gun projected for IS-3, if I recall correctly with like 380mm pen) D-83不会再WOT里面出现。（SS：这只苏联的实验性主炮是准备给IS-3替换 用的，如果我记得没错他的真实穿深大概有380mm） - Soviet "konisch" type squeezebore guns (for example the S-40 with 76-57mm) are not planned 不会有苏联版的缩径炮（像是57到76mm的S-40） - apparently, the ARL-44 armor and engine horsepower are correct in game, wikipedia (SS: well, at least the Russian one) has it wrong 游戏里面的ARL-44装甲数据是正确的，维基上面（SS：嗯...俄版维基） 的数据是错的。 - WoWp won't apparently have plans with 80-100mm guns WOWp暂时不会有配备80-100mm的机炮的飞机出现。 - SerB states that the autoloader vehicles implementation in WoT is okay SerB表示拥有自动装填机的车在游戏里出现没啥问题。 - the number reload timer in 8.9 is not based on any mod, it was made from scratch 8.9里头的装填秒数提示是WOT自己研发，不是从任何MOD来的。 - more functions, allowed by mods (SS: for example custom healthbars and such) do not appear in the game because their usefulness is “questionable”. When asked, who decides what is questionable, SerB replies that WoT is not a democracy and the developers decide what is useful and what is not 许多Mod提供的功能（SS：像是自制血条外观之类的）不会整合到游戏中， 原因是因为有些功能的实用性是「值得商榷的」。当被问到是谁决定「实 用与否」时，SerB说WOT并不民主，由开发组来决定哪些功能有用而那些 没用。 - XP gain when someone else is scouting: when damage done is equal , both TD/tanks and arty get the same amount of XP 如果以他人开光的前提下，经验值获得的计算方式是：当造成同样的伤害 不论是坦克／反坦还是火炮都会获得相同的经验。 - there are no camo mechanism changes in 8.9 8.9不会更动目前的掩蔽机制。 - there is a small XP bonus for surviving a battle, but SerB states it's not much 在战场上存活下来或有些微的经验加成，但SerB说那真的不多。 - there is already a rough concept for the European tech tree, but it's very premature, SerB states that it is analogical a bit to the way Chinese tanks added (SS: as in, there are some local versions of existing tanks, just like China has for example the Chinese Chi-Ha) 欧洲线已经有粗略的雏型，但还不太完整。SerB说这状况有点像是我们为 了要加入中国新车而得到的困扰。（SS：例如说，有一些像是中国掳获版 97式那样的已知车辆的改版）（译：应该是掳获车的问题） - according to SerB, the F1 turret and not the prototype turret was picked for ARL-44, because there were very little differences between this turret and the regular one 根据SerB的说法，FCM F1的炮塔并非是直接取自ARL-44的白板炮塔，因为 FCM F1上面的那颗跟ARL-44上面的那颗有些许的差异。 - price of a shell is not determined by the shell power apparently (SS: that's why the Chinese 122mm HEAT shells were not made cheaper, even though their penetration was nerfed) 弹药的价格并非取决於弹药的威力。（SS：这就是为什麽中国制的HEAT就 算被NERF了还是这麽贵的原因） - there is already a concept how to handle the European tech tree crews, it will be disclosed when the time is right 早已经有一个如何处理欧洲线组员（译：应该是跨国转组员的问题）的构 想，时机到了会告诉你们。（译：还不谢主隆恩！？XD） - apparently, there will be no special permanent reward for the best damage dealer of the losing team in randoms (as an improvement to the "courageous resistance") 目前不会在随机战斗中给予输的那一方伤害输出最大的玩家特别的永久奖 励。（就像目前版本中「奋勇抵抗」的奖励） - there will be at least one more patch in 2013 apart from 8.9 除了8.9，2013还会至少再有一个更新。 同样有问题的部分还是可以跟我说~ 原文网址：http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/23/23-10-2013/#more-4530 另外有一篇文章蛮有趣的，在讲法国FCM F1以及相关的计画 网址：http://tinyurl.com/kqaxlda -- --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.25.182.247 感谢更正~已经更改过了 :) 不会啦~没事儿~我其实也有点在纠结到底怎麽叫比较好 之後会尽量统一~有翻译上不顺的地方还要麻烦大家了 m(_ _)m ※ 编辑: tai33ru 来自: 140.114.112.43 (10/24 18:02)