原文网址: http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/13/13-9-2013/ = Firday 13rd – a good day for translations :) 十三号星期五: 一个适合翻译的日子 :) - according to The_Chieftain, both M36B1 (M4A3 hull with M36 turret) and T53 (not sure what that is) are viable candidates for tier 6 US premium tank destroyer 根据 The_Chieftain 的消息，M36B1 (M4A3 车身 + M36 炮塔)和 T53 (不确定那是甚 麽) 是可行的美国 T6 金币 TD 候补 - Q: “It is now possible to view the amount of tanks I have in garage in the new stats for my account, why is it not possible for other accounts?” A: “For the same reason we your account status is not shown to everyone you meet” (SS: as in, some privacy protection) Q: "现在新的统计页面可以在看我在车库内总共有几辆车，为什麽不能看别人的?" A: "别人同样也看不到" (SS: 隐私的问题) - “vehicles that won’t make a full branch” (SS: the player asks specifically about Israeli tanks) will be “definitely implemented in some way” "没办法组成一条线的车" (SS: 提问的玩家是问以色列车辆) 会 "以某种形式做出来" - the crew voices will not be extended anytime soon (SS: as in, for example more actions commented by voices, such as “load armor piercing!” when selecting armor piercing rounds etc.) 组员语音短时间内不会扩充 (SS: 像是加入更多评论行为的语音，如选择穿甲弹的时候 说 "装填穿甲弹!" 之类的) - WG considers the amount of tanks in your garage to be confidential information (as well as other “account status” info, such as the amount of credits you have) WG 认为你的车库中有多少辆车是个机密的资讯 (其他 "帐号状态" 也是，像是你有多 少银币) - Q: “Why don’t you return the MM to the 8.5 state where most of the battles were of the same tier vehicles (like a team full if tier 7 tanks)?” A: “There was never such a rule. But there was +/-3 tier spread before, should we return that?” Q: "为什麽你们不改回 8.5 之前几乎每辆车都是同阶的分房(像是全队都是 T7 车)?" A: "之前从来没有这样的分房规则过。不过之前有 +/- 3 阶的分房，你要我们改回那 个样子吗?" - SerB on banning trollplatoons: “What about them? Do you have such a weak nervous system that you can’t eat until you kill a trollplatoon? It wont help – there will always be something making you angry. Work on yourself.” SerB 回答关於要不要锁那些乱组队的人的帐号: "那那些人怎麽办? 难道你不干掉那些 乱组队的人你就食不下咽了吗? 锁了也没用，总是会有让你整个 LP 都是火的情形，你 自己看着办吧" - Q: “Why wasn’t the teamdamage system change described in the patchnotes?” A: “Description is simple – to teamkill is bad. Nothing changed in that regard.” Q: "为什麽改版资讯里面没有伤害队友系统的内容?" A: "内容很简单: TK 不好。这并没有改" - TOG II is doing fine according to SerB SerB 指出 TOG II 表现得很 OK - SerB on some guns doing as much damage as they do: “Once you find a historical amount of damage the guns did in hitpoints, we will review it immediately” (SS: gun damage is a balance parameter) SerB 回答某些炮的伤害值是不是它该有的数值的问题 : "当你找到一门炮可以造成多 少血量伤害的历史资料，我们会马上看" (SS: 炮的伤害是个平衡用的数值) - regarding the national voiceovers: it won’t be possible to select the voiceover pack manually (so that all tanks speak German for example) 谈到国籍语音: 没办法手动选择要讲哪一国话 (像是所有的车都讲德文之类的) - Q: “On what formula does the Courageous resistance work?” A: “IF(BattleLoosed AND (GotEpicAvard OR GotBattleHero))” Q: ""英勇的抵抗" 这个奖励是以甚麽样的公式去算出来的?" A: "如果战斗输了同时又拿到史诗奖章或拿到战斗英雄奖章时，你就会得到这个奖励" // 给看得懂 C/C++ 的人: if (bBattleLoosed && (bGotEpicAvard || bGotBattleHero)) bCourageousResistance = true; - some objects act like view range obstacles (houses), some don’t (a heap of hay) (SS: generally the easily destroyable don’t) 某些物件是视线障碍物 (房子)，有的不是(一堆乾草) (SS: 基本上容易摧毁的都不是) - On Westfield map there was a bush removed on F0, but there was nothing in patchnotes? “How terrible…” Westfield 这张图的 F0 有一丛树丛被移掉了，不过改版消息里没写? "好贴萝卜..." - Mountain Pass (F6 quadrant) is missing one path that could be climbed? “ How terrible…” Mountain Pass (F6 区域(译注: 原文写象限)) 少了一条可以爬的路? "好贴萝卜..." - El Halluf – a hill was reworked at G6? “How terrible…” El Halluf G6 的山丘被改过了? "好贴萝卜" - Q: “0.8.9 – new German TD branch?” A: “Really?!” (SS: yes, SerB’s just trolling) Q: "8.9 有新的德国 TD 线?" A: "真的吗?!" (SS: 是的，SerB 只是在嘲讽) - Q: “What prevents you from adding some interface mod features into the game for more comfort?” A: “The fact that we don’t consider overstuffed interface comfortable” Q: "是甚麽原因让你们不把一些让画面(游戏介面)看起来更舒服的 MOD 功能加进游戏 里?" A: "我们觉得画面上面塞太多东西看起来并不会很舒服" - there was “no promise” to make the ingame chat possible to disable. SerB: “It’s a team game” "不保证" 会让游戏内能够关闭聊天。SerB: "这是个团队合作的游戏" - French arty won’t recieve a shell velocity buff 不会 buff 法国自走炮的炮弹速度 - regarding possible rebalance: the amount of certain vehicle in battles is a secondary indicator 提到可能的重新平衡: 战斗中有多少辆(可能要重新平衡的)车是个次要的指标 - it’s possible that (in clanwars) to use “air strike” won’t require the pilots (WoWp players) to be a part of the same clan, but will be performed by freelancers 有可能会让 WoT 公会战中呼叫某个 WoWp 玩家进行 "空袭"，而且 WoWp 玩家不需要和 呼叫空袭的队伍同公会 - enough British heavies or meds for second branch? “Doubtful” 英国有足够的重坦或中坦做另一条线? "很怀疑有没有" - apparently, the Encounter on the Mines map won’t be reworked, as the devs checked the winrate of both sides and the difference is less than 5 percent (the reason for the 5 percent is that stats have shown that the winrate usually changes constantly within those 5 percent differences, so the difference below those 5 percent won’t be taken into account) 看来 Mines 的遭遇战模式不会改动，开发组检查过两边的胜率数据，其差异小於 5% ( 会用 5% 作为要不要更动的原因是因为两边的胜率常常都在 50±5% 浮动，所以 5% 之内 的差异不会考量进去) - Lowe won’t be changed in the future, its stats are fine Lowe 未来不会改，它的统计数据很 OK - in 0.8.9, midtier arty will be buffed (SS: hightier won’t be) 8.9 里中阶自走炮会被 buff (SS: 高阶不会) - the reason for the possibility to disable the whole interface is making WoT movies 能够完全隐藏游戏介面的原因是为了要做 WoT 的影片 = 完 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 36.231.22.113