原文网址: http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/02/2-9-2013-2/ = Today was a bit technical, so I hope I got everything right 今天的问题比较技术性，我希望我没有弄错问题的内容 - SerB is not afraid of WoWp stealing players from WoT, he thinks the migration will be normal SerB 不担心 WoWp 会拉走 WoT 的玩家，他觉得玩家跑去玩很正常 - SerB describing the difference between US and Soviet penetration methodology: “The difference is in the amount of shell fragments, that make it past the armor. In the common American and German system it is based on “primary penetration” (20 percent of fragments make it behind the armor), while the Soviet data are based on the “guaranteed penetration” (80 percent). We compared the data of German and American 75mm guns tested in USSR and with German 50mm, 88mm and British 57mm. There is a 1,17 times difference on average” SerB 描述美国和苏联计算穿深的方法之间的不同: "不同点是在计算击穿装甲的炮弹碎 片多寡；美国和德国的系统是基於 "初级击穿" (有 20% 的碎片穿过装甲)，而苏联的资 料是基於 "保证击穿" (80%)。我们比较过在苏联测试过的德国和美国 75mm炮、德国的 50mm 和 88mm炮、英国的57mm炮，它们的数据在两种方法之间平均有 1.17倍的差距" - SerB states that this table is not accurate, he considers the Soviet gun tests table accurate SerB 表示这个表格并不正确，他认为苏联的测试表格才是正确的 - according to the (Soviet) data above, the Ferdinand 88mm gun performed worse than the Soviet D-10T and D-52. SerB and others were wondering why that happened, it was possible the Soviets used very early ammunition model (SS: Flak), in the end, they decided not to nerf the Ferdinand gun based on this 根据上面的苏联资料，Ferdinand 88mm 炮表现得比苏联的 D-10T 和 D-52 差。SerB 和其他人在想为什麽会这样，有可能苏联是用很早期的炮弹模型去算的(SS: 高射炮)，基 於这个原因他们最後决定不要 nerf Ferdinand 的炮 - WG actually started using the German penetration methodology, but switched to the Soviet one during closed WoT beta WG 一开始用的是德国计算穿深的方法，不过 WoT CB 的时候改成用苏联的算法 - T-62 won’t appear in WoT, SerB categorically denies the appearance of smoothbore guns (SerB states that the current “armor plays no role” whine would be mild in comparison, as smoothbore guns typically have 400mm+ penetration) T-62 不会在 WoT 出现，SerB 断然拒绝滑膛炮出现在游戏内(SerB 表示实装的话目前 的 "装甲无用论" 抱怨会比较少，因为基本上滑膛炮的穿深都超过 400mm) - SerB states that historically the E-75 had neither 120mm sides, nor a 128mm gun, it had 80mm side armor. It was not an improvement of the King Tiger, but its simplification for production. Currently it is not historical in game and if a suitable candidate for its replacement is found, it will be reconsidered (SS: that’s funny, I thought it was actually 120mm) SerB 表示历史上 E-75 没有 120mm 的车侧装甲，也没有 128mm 炮，它的侧装甲是 80mm。跟 KT 比起来没有太大的进步，不过比较容易生产。目前游戏内的 E-75 不符合 史实，如果有找到可能代替的车辆，会考虑用找到的那辆车(SS: 真有趣，我还以为真的 是 120mm) - the final variant of Panther II lower frontal plate was allegedly planned to be 120mm thick, SerB will have a look at it too (SS: probably a typo, the poster most likely means upper frontal plate) Panther II 首下装甲最後听说要改成 120mm 厚，SerB 也会去查查资料(SS: 应该是张 贴的人打字错误，指的应该是首上装甲厚度) - theoretically it would be possible to nerf the D-25T penetration to 165 by introducing early type shells, but it won’t be done… for now 理论上有可能利用引进早期型炮弹来 nerf D-25T 的穿甲能力到 165，不过目前不会改 - SerB agrees with the King Tiger 105mm aim time nerf SerB 赞同 nerf KT 105 炮的瞄准时间 - SerB states that the 8.8 changes in German heavy tanks mobility still made them roughly equal in value to what they were before SerB 表示 8.8 对德国重坦行动力的更动仍使得它们的价值和之前大略相同 - SerB sees no reason for rebalancing T-62A/Object 140 in order to make them differ more from one another SerB 找不到任何需要重新平衡 T-62A/Obj. 140 使得它们更不相像的理由 - it’s possible the collision model of the Object 140 will change (making it bigger) 有可能Obj. 140 的碰撞模组会改变(改大一点) - historically, the D-5T and S-53 guns were considered sufficient until the King Tiger appeared. But the fact that the 85BM gun appeared shows that the ballistic properties of 52-K were considered inferior to the German 88mm 历史上，D-5T 和 S-53 炮在 KT 出现之前都认为是足够的。但事实上 85BM 炮的出现 指出 52-K 的弹道性能比不上德国的 88 炮 - IS-7 will not be made more mobile IS-7 的行动力不会改的更好 - animated tail gunner will be implemented into WoWp WoWp 会做尾炮手的动画 = 完 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 36.231.19.163