作者sunshinefish (羽织)
看板WoT
标题[情报] SS: Obj. 140 与 T-62A 哪个比较好?
时间Wed Aug 28 17:42:41 2013
原文网址:
http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/28/which-one-is-better-object-140-or-t-62a/
=
Source: wot-news.com
来源: wot-news.com
Hello everyone,
大家好:
As some of you know, I am not exactly fond of Soviet tanks (I levelled up the
T-54, but that’s about it), so I can’t really evaluate the Object 140′s
performance, compared to the T-62. That’s why I am taking Edrard’s assessment
and translating it to English. Edrard is the owner of wot-news and generally
a good player, so I think his opinion counts in this. First, let’s have a look
at Object 140′s armor and size, compared to the T-62A:
某些人可能知道我不是很喜欢苏联战车(我有升到 T-54,不过就只有这样),所以我没办
法真正去评量和比较 Obj. 140 与 T-62 的性能。这是我将 Edrard 的评测翻译成英文的
原因,Edrard 是个不错的玩家同时也是 wot-news 的所有者,所以我认为他对 Obj. 140
与 T-62 的看法应该可以参考。首先我们来看 Obj. 140 的大小与装甲以及和 T-62A 的
比较:
http://ftr.wot-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/part2_12.jpg
http://ftr.wot-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/part2_13.jpg
Size comparison to T-62A:
与 T-62A 的大小比较:
http://ftr.wot-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/part2_15.jpg
Stats comparison on paper:
纸上资料比较:
http://ftr.wot-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/part2_14.jpg

Edrard on their comparison (edited by me a bit in order to make it more
comprehensive):
Edrard 比较两辆车的结论 (稍微修改让它比较容易读懂):
As you can see from the pictures above, Object 140 is a bit lighter, faster
and smaller. It’s frontal armor has a better angle. On the other hand, T-62A
has a better hull and turret turnrate – and yes, 50 more hitpoints. But
that’s not really that important. Frontal armor of both the T-62A and Object
140 can be penetrated by tier 8 heavies, both turrets are very tough and like
to ricochet shells and if anyone tells you that the Object 140 is much better
than the T-62A – don’t trust him.
从上面的图片可以看出 Obj.140 比较轻一点、快一点、小一点,同时它的前装甲角度也
比较好。另一方面 T-62A 的车身装甲和炮塔转速比较好,另外还有一项不太重要的优点:
多了 50 血量。T-62A 与 Obj.140 的前装甲都会被 T8 重坦击穿,两者的炮塔都很硬而
且很会弹炮。如果有人跟你说 Obj. 140 比 T-62A 好很多,他在唬你。
Both vehicles are basically modifications of one of the same tank: the T-54
and that’s why they are very much alike, like twin brothers. Object 140 is
an excellent tier 10 tank, practically identical to T-62A – and that’s his
problem. Gameplay-wise, both vehicles are are absolutely identical and it
brings nothing new to the game, which stands out even more when we consider
other vehicles of the branch, such as A-44 and Object 416, which are quite
unusual.
两辆车基本上都是从 T-54 改出来的,这也是为什麽它们很像双胞胎的原因。 Obj. 140
是辆很棒的 T10 车,唯一的问题是原则上它和 T-62A 一模一样,玩起来的感觉也完全一
样,不像该中坦线上其他车子(A-44、Obj. 416)一样特殊。
At this moment, the Soviet tree seems to me as the one most raw and least
finished. There’s a hole at tier 5 in the light tank branch, second medium
branch is missing tier 9 and 10, as Object 140 is more like a development of
the T-54 and has no relationship towards the Kharkov tanks. Now we can only
wait for them to fill the gaps and introduce new vehicles, corresponding to
the intended concept of the branches.
就我看来,目前苏联线是最不完整的;轻坦线在 T5 有个空缺、第二条中坦线少了 T9 和
T10 车 (Obj. 140 比较像是 T-54 的延伸而和 Kharkov 的车辆无关)。我们现在只能等
WG 加些新车把这些分支上的空缺补齐。
Silentstalker: Well, there you have it. He thinks the vehicles are
practically identical and so do I. One thing that is notable is the upper
turret weakspot: the roof is very thin and as the vehicle is quite low, it’s
possible to penetrate. 8.8 test players already noticed this “feature”. But
other than that, for different gameplay, we’ll have to wait for the Object
430.
SS: Edrard 他觉得两辆车基本上完全一样,我也这麽觉得。有件值得注意的事情是炮塔
上部的弱点: 此车不高加上顶端非常薄,很有机会车顶会被击穿。 8.8 测服的玩家已经
注意到这个 "特点"。如果想要有辆玩起来不一样的车,那要等 Obj. 430了。
=
完
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.66.243.96
※ 编辑: sunshinefish 来自: 61.66.243.96 (08/28 17:43)
1F:→ x000032001 :结论 两台一样 08/28 17:49
2F:推 hemisofia :我觉得T8重坦想打穿62A正面需要相当运气说-_- 08/28 17:49
3F:推 korsg :T62A的正面装甲角度很不好打阿~~ 08/28 18:16
4F:推 kill90206 :发展史:T-54>OBJ.140>T-55>T-62 08/28 18:39
5F:→ kill90206 :而T-62=OBJ.140炮塔+T-55车身(两个都有进一步修改) 08/28 18:40
6F:推 Theo57 :根据FTR之前贴出来的ST装甲图,430头顶也是很薄的 08/28 18:56
9F:→ ken80117 :看这两张大致可以知道为啥140不会送去给430当九阶 08/28 18:58
10F:→ Theo57 :这样看来相对於430是T-64前身,140算T-72的祖先了 08/28 19:01
11F:推 ccc73123 :这两台都是T-62的前身 其实T-62A就是OBJ.165 08/28 21:28
12F:→ ccc73123 :OBJ.165=OBJ.140炮塔+OBJ.150车身 08/28 21:28
13F:→ ccc73123 :OBJ.166=OBJ.165改115mm滑膛炮=T-62 08/28 21:29
14F:推 kill90206 :OBJ430不是T-62的前身... 08/28 21:46
15F:→ ccc73123 :我的意思是T-62A和OBJ.140都是T-62的前身 08/28 22:35
16F:推 kill90206 :说T-62A是T-62的前身有点怪..这两台比较像异卵双胞胎 08/28 23:59
17F:→ ccc73123 :OBJ.140(T-62A)改115mm炮就是T-62 说是前身也没错 08/29 00:02
18F:→ ccc73123 :因为T-62A根本没量产 改火炮之後的OBJ.166(T-62)才是 08/29 00:03
19F:→ ccc73123 :量产型&有服役纪录 08/29 00:03
20F:→ ccc73123 :上面打错 *OBJ.165(T-62A) 08/29 00:04
21F:推 ccc73123 :140+150>165>改115mm炮>166 大概是这种关系 08/29 00:09
23F:→ ntueesuevan :Gun depression 可能有 -7度 08/29 00:11
24F:推 molukino :T62A还有颗硬硬头阿 08/29 00:13
25F:推 Theo57 :记得T-62A有量产,但很快就停,所以只做了十几二十辆 08/29 00:19
26F:→ Theo57 :跟140的关系好像只有炮塔跟抛壳装置,而炮塔之後应该 08/29 00:23
27F:→ Theo57 :有再修改,才变成现在游戏看到的那个炮塔。 08/29 00:24
28F:→ Theo57 :话说150是那来的?个人没有看过150..... 08/29 00:25
29F:推 kill90206 :T-62A有量产阿 不然就不会叫T-62A了 08/29 00:38
30F:推 ccc73123 :造个十几台哪叫量产... 08/29 00:41
31F:→ kill90206 :因为怕第一次用滑膛炮当战车炮会出包,所以也把旋膛 08/29 00:41
32F:→ kill90206 :版本的也批准量产了,但没多久就取消了 08/29 00:43
33F:→ kill90206 :只要有进入量产程序,就是量产,只是T-62A很快就停产 08/29 00:47
34F:→ LoveIvy :QB有说俯角有差 08/29 01:16
35F:→ djmez :不是怕用滑膛炮会出包 是因为D54TS本身的优点也很多 08/29 14:10
36F:→ djmez :会下马是因为赫鲁雪夫的喜好和西方开始用105L7 08/29 14:11
37F:→ djmez :如果不是口径迷思和赫鲁雪夫 就不会有天女散花的115 08/29 14:12